>Newsweek problems?
Article was written Feb1st. I had it up but it got moved to yahoo. Seems it's back to newsweek main site. Feb5th, 2 editors and a reporter were fired. Others resigned in "protest". Week earlier Chairman and Chief Financial officer resigned for fraud.
>http:// www.newsweek.com/how-storm-biggest->fake-news-story-796725
>Strike back against us?
>MSM not happy?
>"Conspiracy" label.
>Re_read crumbs re: "conspiracy" / MSM >coverage.
The Conspiracy Theory label was invented by the CIA. Disproved via JFK files and 2nd shooter. Should make public question story. I wrote about this on medium. Tried to explain Q and anons in normie friendly language without linking here and without giving specifics. Pointed to using it as educational for researching truth, regardless of validity. If normies research and seek truth, they'll figure it out for themselves.
They can get away with discredit due to Corsi claiming advance knowledge without being able to remember any instances. Have to be careful of claiming predictions, because if you're wrong, they'll use it discredit the entire thing.
>Who will be next?
>They are here.
>They will try to discredit.
>They are stupid.
>They bring more eyes.
>The 'proofs' are important.
'>Proofs' provide new 'eyes' ability to question.
>This board in the coming months will be spread & >discussed across ALL PLATFORMS.
>Important to be prepared.
>We will help.
>TRUTH always wins.
>Q
I've been tentative about writing about it due to being viewed as namefagging, but it's at a point where we need it in a media friendly translation that just gets people to start looking for themselves. Discuss the facts without jumping to conclusions. It'll be easier with past events since crumbs points to actual events as proof are harder to dispute than those you tubers that are trying to predict events.