>>399442
Will do if I can get some links or relevant responses. So far, mostly "we already discussed it" is what I'm getting.
Not blaming bakers but we need to find a way to make sure that "relevant" findings are making it into the bread. When Q posts things go so fast a lot gets missed or left out and then no one wants to rehash it even though it didn't get added.
If it isn't in the bread, it should be up for discussion, even repeat discussion, because it is data we are missing, connections not being made for the overall map.