Anonymous ID: 87676e Feb. 16, 2018, 12:40 p.m. No.399708   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9775 >>0096

>>399442

Will do if I can get some links or relevant responses. So far, mostly "we already discussed it" is what I'm getting.

 

Not blaming bakers but we need to find a way to make sure that "relevant" findings are making it into the bread. When Q posts things go so fast a lot gets missed or left out and then no one wants to rehash it even though it didn't get added.

 

If it isn't in the bread, it should be up for discussion, even repeat discussion, because it is data we are missing, connections not being made for the overall map.

Anonymous ID: 87676e Feb. 16, 2018, 1:17 p.m. No.400058   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>399990

 

What are you bitching about? The github account has been warned that it will be taken down due to too much traffic. This anon is IN THE PROCESS (meaning not finished yet) of creating a new version. It has nothing to do with archiving offline, that is a separate undertaking.

Anonymous ID: 87676e Feb. 16, 2018, 1:35 p.m. No.400248   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0285

>>400137

Preaching to the choir.

 

I'm telling the guy screaming that the new platform is totally unacceptable and we need to archive everything offline that he is barking up the wrong tree.