There are a number of these that don't match "the consensus" interpretation:
>2. JA = Justin Amash
Julian Assange.
>3. JK = Jared Kushner
John Kerry
>11. JC = James Clyburn
James Comey
Initials, being what they are, may have multiple meanings. In most of the posts we've decoded, context is usually enough to decipher the identity in question within a given.
I see a bunch of different messaging around SecureDrop, but it seems incomplete and/or non-unified - so let me put all of my thoughts in one place:
SecureDrop is at a minimum compromised by C_A
SecureDrop may have been a C_A op from the beginning
While the encryption may in fact be strong, the anonymity is a lie
It's a honeypot, where genuine whistleblowers can be identified, and targeted
It's also used as a message platform for bad actors, including but not limited to Mockingbird related communications
Related items:
Barlow's death - He was either:
– A bad actor, and taken out by white hats (less likely)
– An innocent, who discovered the true nature of SecureDrop, and was taken out by black hats (I lean toward this)
Other "anonymity" projects are likely similarly compromised
– Specifically Tor
Good addition… Related directly to this news article:
CIA Argues The Public Can’t See Classified Information It Has Already Given To Favored Reporters
http:// dailycaller.com/2018/02/15/cia-argues-the-public-cant-see-classified-information-it-has-already-given-to-favored-reporters/
>Barlow literally wrote about how he helped the CIA set up it's online presence in Forbes
>https:// www.forbes.com/asap/2002/1007/042_2.html
Had missed that. Thanks.