Just want to add my two cents here: this entire thread is just perfect. You did an amazing job with this. Clear, concise, complete, and you went at a pace that didn't leave people scratching their heads. If this were a final exam it would be higher than A+. Awesome job.

The day this thread began, I posted very high praise for it. However it's now a month later. What do we have for a month's time?

Reading through this thread: if the main general thread is messed with, why wouldn't this one be?

What is the pattern we see on, for example, InfoWars? Present a bold new theory as if the sky is falling. Build, build, build on it.

Drop it, unannounced and unresolved, and move to the next thing.

Not one theory presented in this thread has remained consistent. Every one has followed the InfoWars pattern: build, build, build, silently drop.

Don't announce you're dropping it. Don't make any declarations about it at all. Just drop it like a child who's bored with a toy and move on to the next one.

How do you drop it? Stop discussing it. Just stop.

THAT pattern remains 100% consistent across this entire thread.

If the methodology behind the Q map were at all contained in this thread, then the thread could not have continued on for as long as it has without a consistent build-up to final completion. That has not occurred.

This is our InfoWars thread. Danger, Will Robinson.

There's a point where, if you're at all on track to discovering the method, you must stop searching for the method and start applying what you have to build the final product.

Here, it is eternal searching and no building. No idea presented here persists.

Q would never have made things this complicated.