I wouldn't be surprised.
I think all the swamp are.
It also could be made up against him.
But remember he was the one who is said to have betrayed Flynn!.
yes, but they don't look enough alike to be twins.
And the original attended Yale in 1919
Same with the original Alex Jones vs. Bill Hicks.
They were not twins.
Surgery was used.
This book [pic related] is historical fiction, as I see it. And describes what they really do.
The twins thing is very true. They use twins as well.
Check out the Sweigert brothers, Dave and George ["Webb"}. They are certainly twins, but said to be 6 years apart in age.
The original Bushes may have had cousins in Germany?
I believe they obscured the connection to Vanaver Bush who was a founder of MIT.
Looks they faked the geneology so they could claim "no relation"
Too much of a coincidence between the career of Vanaver and the rise of the "Bush" dynasty in USA
It works because people don't use their eyes. They just go with what they are told.
All true. That's how you know there is something there. Otherwise, they wouldn't bother.
Who cares if you don't have the right angle to see how the handoff was accomplished.
LOGIC
They are grasping at anything to discredit.
Why could they care so much?
All I could think of was is they are desperate to keep control of the narrative - which is what they are told.
I've been thinking about the qustions
"How do you catch a dangerous animal?"
And I just realized.
They must be rendered harmless. BEFORE the truth comes out to the public.
Because otherwise they will retaliate, even if it does them no good; Just like a wild animal.