Anonymous ID: 94cf62 Feb. 18, 2018, 3:51 p.m. No.422024   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2053 >>2085 >>2602

>EM being sarcastic tried to distance himself from the tech that made it's way to NK. Knowing that UFOs & aliens are a stellar way to get the conspiracy label thrown on, his sarcastic tweet was actually a shot @ Q and anons. That's part one. Not a confirmation of UFOs in any way.

>Q's next post was in response to the anon above it, as in Obama allowing crooked EM and SpaceX to privately take over what Navy & NASA for the sake of destroying our National security on that front (land, sea, air and space). Well, no longer, our domination of space as a Nation, with or without SpaceX (and ideally w/o EM), is guaranteed to return.

>Was terminated for specific reason - Re_read the 16 Year Plan crumb for more details.

Anonymous ID: 94cf62 Feb. 18, 2018, 3:53 p.m. No.422053   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2073

>>422024

>UFO put out

>Space is critical to our NAT SEC

Those are two sentences that I have trouble explaining. How can you "put out a UFO"? Why is space "critical" if all we have out there is lifeless rocks?

Anonymous ID: 94cf62 Feb. 18, 2018, 4:08 p.m. No.422218   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>422167

Of that entire jab Q has actually singled-out UFO's. Whether that's his way of "striking back" at Musk or a reference to a more important topic, I'd like to know…

>>422197

I know. I just can't shake the feeling there's more to this. If that explanation stands, that's ok too.