>>4808990

Ty baker!

If you stay for another bread, or stick around to authorize next baker to add these, would you consider adding this dig to notables? Any anons think it's worth nominating?

>>4808850 lb

Missed notable?

>>4808359, >>4808416, >>4808849 (You) Third Path Institute re: Kids & Hussein/Jarrett

If incoming baker would prefer adding to current bread, I'm OP, would happily repost, just lemme know. If not interested, no worries. Just didn't want it to have been missed as an oversight since this kind of dug info isn't readily available as a pre-packaged news article. Was my own research.

>>4809162

Ty for the dialog baker.

Agreed we don't to malign good men, but to deny the connection shown bc you don't want it to reflect negatively on good men is, I argue, to actually play into the cover they were hoping for. It's why I titled part I "Not all dads." If we didn't already have evidence Hussein was a pedo, maybe it would be too loose. But since we do, there are too many coincidences not to be potentially significant.

>unless you can find me an actual connection to VJ/BO

I don't understand, how are those connections not shown?

Directly connects the working dads theme to Josh Levs (CNN media darling) meeting personally with Hussein showing a pic of Hussein holding an infant…

Directly connects the founder of the Institute (DeGroot) to speaking at a Jarrett conference, where bio pic of deGroot is also heavy on little kids. This isn't just a blame-dads thing, it's the suggestion that "work-life-balance" in the hands of top Dems, and in particular, this Third Path Institute, could be a cover for pedo shit.

Keep in mind that I also know, personally, that the source twatter for this info is of a cabal-member pedo family. That's only info on my end tho since I can't sauce that, but it's why I know that if I dig any of his "kid" twats I'll end up finding something. Which I did.

But anyway, it's your call of course. Just putting my rationale out there.

>>4809162, >>4809280

Ty for the dialog baker.

Agreed we don't to malign good men, but to deny the connection shown bc you don't want it to reflect negatively on good men is, I argue, to actually play into the cover they were hoping for. It's why I titled part I "Not all dads." If we didn't already have evidence Hussein was a pedo, maybe it would be too loose a connection. But since we do, there are too many coincidences not to be potentially significant. I mean, come on, you don't find that parachuting pic bizarre? Does that say "good day" to you?

>unless you can find me an actual connection to VJ/BO

I don't understand, how are those connections not shown?

Directly connects the working dads theme to Josh Levs (CNN media darling) meeting personally with Hussein showing a pic of Hussein holding an infant…

Directly connects the founder of the Institute (DeGroot) to speaking at a Jarrett conference, where bio pic of deGroot is also heavy on little kids. This isn't just a blame-dads thing, it's the suggestion that "work-life-balance" in the hands of top Dems, and in particular, this Third Path Institute, could be a cover for pedo shit.

Keep in mind that I also know, personally, that the source twatter for this info is of a cabal-member pedo family. That's only info on my end tho since I can't sauce that, but it's why I know that if I dig any of his "kid" twats I'll end up finding something. Which I did.

But anyway, it's your call of course, especially if no other anons are interested. Just putting my rationale out there.

>>4809368

>"good day"

*good dad

>>4809399

>provide all the sauce for all three parts of your post.

I could do that but it would take a lot of work, which wouldn't be worth doing if you don't want to include based on aversion to the content. You're right to ask for sauce tho. I had it back when I grabbed the pics, but that was a few months ago. I'll try to dig up sauce to prove Josh Levs is the same guy, to sauce the 2 pics in this reply to me, we'll start there. Agreed this is the smoking gun, the connection to Hussein. If I can't sauce it then they whole thing's moot.

>>4809399, >>4809501, >>4809557

Ty baker

Here's Josh Levs's youtube account referencing the Hussein meeting and the book

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqUNsgz_H3s

Here's link to the book on googlebooks

https://books.google.com/books/about/Future_Leaders_Visit_the_President.html?id=00kRMQAACAAJ

Here's amazon for the "All In" book mentioned in the Third Path twat:

https://www.amazon.com/All-Work-First-Families-Businesses-Together/dp/0062349619

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/4808968.html#4809501

>>4809694

Wow, really? How is this not the same guy?

>>4809711

>You can't call him an evil child molester just because he had Obama on the cover.

I didn't, there's a body of circumstantial evidence to be taken together

>Simply saying he was the same guy isn't enough.

But that's where you said to start. And I agreed, let's start there…

Nevermind.

Carry on baker.