>>4898207

>Is it a coincidence that we have yet another dynamic IP pop up just prior to a Greerfag post?

>Coincidence they are bouncing voices off each other to make it appear as though Anons believe this bake is comp'd

It is kinda funny how that happens eh?

Also, did you notice how the posts were both really late at night (early morning)?

Haven't we seen that before with the floating IP's that Greerfag replies to?

Ha… "these people are STUPID".

>Watch for (((those))) who scream the loudest.

(((f9e639)))

(((e72715)))

(((352ce6)))

>Yes please, make another post with ID e72715.

Agreed, I want to see another post from ID e72715 to prove that isn't a dynamic IP resetting that Greershill is using as one last desperate attempt to maintain control of these threads.

>I think thou doth protest too much.

>>4950173

>Check the past bread as well as the meta thread.

>tl;dr one guy was triggered at another guy who was spamming ce-5 videos, and apparently both of them advocate the same thing.

That's not the impression I get!

>>4944823

I think that was the point being made?

>>4971643

>The rules say not to respond to trolls or shills. Give me something on topic to work with.

Truly, if you go back through the past few breads you may notice a trend of 'shills' and slides at the same time Broken Record CE-5 Anon is posting (usually in his two's or three's). Sliding the board to distract from the real digs? You Anons can be the judge.