Anonymous ID: 4ceb0a Jan. 25, 2019, 3:43 p.m. No.4908249   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4908189

When did you find out about all this. I mean really find out?

Hundreds of years of fukkery and we are witnessing it being taken care of in 2. This is unheard of. These people aren't skating.

POTUS cares about PEOPLE, period. This plan is to guide the PEOPLE. Something that has never been done by (((them))).

It's frustrating, we have to see both sides and it may feel one sided but that is needed. It will be SO worth it in the end.

Anonymous ID: 4ceb0a Jan. 25, 2019, 4:03 p.m. No.4908515   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4908445

I don't think there's ever been proof or sauce that states they "have" to be there.

I do think it is based on a level of respect for the POTUS.

Also, SCJ's need to be up to date with the President's plan and state of the union. It should be in their best judgement to be in attendance.