Anonymous ID: 131565 May 5, 2018, 2:30 p.m. No.1310983   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1143 >>3047

>>1310801

I'm a little behind in my archives at the moment, but that should be remedied by this evening. (I was busy working on my tools.) My site is a good one for looking at tweets vs. Q posts because I can show them on the same timeline.

http://q-questions.info/research-tool.php

Anonymous ID: 131565 May 5, 2018, 5:51 p.m. No.1313047   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1310983

For some reason, posts on Q's new board aren't saving properly (except the first post on the thread). But I'll have everything else up there shortly.

Anonymous ID: 131565 May 5, 2018, 7:12 p.m. No.1313946   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1313667

Yes, my posts are saved in GMT also.

 

I've about got the issue with the new Q board taken care of. I just needed to tell my database about it. I'm getting those posts ready to upload now.

 

As it happens, I'm currently working on setting up special search types that you may find useful. One of those search types will show just the Q posts and POTUS tweets. That way, you won't have to think about the proper way to limit your searches if that is what you are after. Look for that in the next day or two. I'm still working on finalizing that feature.

Anonymous ID: 131565 May 6, 2018, 12:22 p.m. No.1319771   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6496

>>1314163

It would not be difficult at all to include calculations in my displays. So let me double-check what the logic should be.

 

When displaying a Q post

– show delta since last Trump tweet.

 

When displaying a Trump tweet

– show delta since last Trump tweet

– show delta since last Q post

 

Is there anything else?

Anonymous ID: 131565 May 7, 2018, 12:54 p.m. No.1329318   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1326496

I didn't even attempt to find the series. I'm simply showing the delta between the last of either. I suppose I could. So what is the pattern we are looking for?

Anonymous ID: 131565 May 7, 2018, 1:07 p.m. No.1329416   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1326496

Not sure how checking the box kills results. The logic of the check box is implemented in a way that does not affect the search logic. The deltas are calculated after the fact. The actual SQL statement that creates the results is at the top of the page. That doesn't change. Still, I've seen unusual and unexpected things before. What are you seeing that has you thinking there's a difference in the search results?

Anonymous ID: 131565 May 8, 2018, 3:43 p.m. No.1341497   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1398

Never mind. The whole darn thing broke. I had overhauled the search logic to better support the data prep steps, and I guess stuff got messed up in the process. When I get done being disgusted about that, I'll fix it.

Anonymous ID: 131565 May 17, 2018, 12:53 p.m. No.1446207   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6391

>>1445611

I have no idea what elasticsearch is. Would you care to explain?

 

I'm still working on things. At the moment, I'm adding some editing features to the research-tool version of things that I'd had in a prior tool. If you've noticed, older posts on my site have thumbnails and screenshots of links from the posts. And I've also started some work on the flagging feature so that I can feel better about putting all of the images back online rather than just selected ones.

Anonymous ID: 131565 May 30, 2018, 4:14 p.m. No.1591211   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1506424

Just got back from vacation and saw this. My site can display Q posts and Trump tweets in the same search results in time order.

http://q-questions.info/research-tool.php

I just got back from vacation, so my archive is over a week behind at the moment. I should be more current in a few hours.

Anonymous ID: 131565 June 13, 2018, 12:43 p.m. No.1732451   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3098

Last night, anons were discussing the fact that the chans are part of history. Concern was expressed about the shill impacts on the boards and that perhaps there needed to be a cleaner view of it all. I suppose one answer could be to get back to the original purpose intended for the private version of my database, which is to identify what should be included in the blog that is in the root directory of the site. I haven't actually updated anything there in quite a while. Maybe it's time to get back to that.

Anonymous ID: 131565 June 13, 2018, 1:19 p.m. No.1733203   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1733098

It HAS been a lot of work and will continue to be. I've been coasting for a bit, just making sure that the general threads have been archived and made available. But there's also a lot of processing to do with the data if the ultimate goal is to be achieved as imagined. Kinda wish there was a way to safely share the work.

Anonymous ID: 131565 June 13, 2018, 2:16 p.m. No.1734049   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5439

One of the tricky things about making my research tool available publicly is that the platforms are different. Different operating system, different database, and (apparently) different PHP. So I may have something working perfectly on my development machine, but I find there are problems when I try to share it. If the focus is to prepare the blog, which is an abridged view, then maybe I shouldn't sweat it if what I have shared publicly doesn't always work?

Anonymous ID: 131565 June 13, 2018, 5 p.m. No.1736163   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1735439

I probably do. It's all databased. I'd just have to put stuff into a structure and run an encode_json() on it. Not sure it would be all that easy to put the advanced features into the JSON, though. It doesn't solve the problem of making something accessible for non-techie types, though, which is my goal.

Anonymous ID: 131565 June 22, 2018, 2:50 p.m. No.1865819   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1865264

Certainly a page could be made for telling people how to search the original sources. Maybe it could include input fields as well to help people get it right. Unfortunately, original sources have been hacked from time to time, and some material is no longer available.

Anonymous ID: 131565 June 23, 2018, 10:42 a.m. No.1876296   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9714

>>1873487

My project has the capability of searching by threads.

 

As for breads, I'd been working toward that, and I'll probably get back to it soon. The challenge of breads is a bit tougher because they must be identified. So far, my own solution has been a combination of automation and inspection.