This is Thomas anon,
Good day anons,
Well, here we are, the countdown is finished. And finally that time frame is closed. I have no clue what Q team and Potus were doing behind the scenes but it looks like they were quiet busy. Now let me fill that last place in the Unicorn tapestry / [-7] countdown by putting that the window is close as in, from now on, (((they))) are caged in.
I spent quiet some time in the general thread for the last few days. That place surely runs fast but got me some interesting stuff as well.
It’s been some time that I’ve declared that the Clintons are the Masters of Epstein Island. Well, finally Q said it himself in drop 3050 when he connected Haiti with the pedo island’s temple. The Clintons oversaw what took place in Haiti and they have been overseeing what is taking place at Epstein Island for at least 20 years.
When I started to post this in the general thread a bit of time ago, I got terribly shilled, ignored and then attacked by anons telling me I’m stupid or I’m wrong or I am retarted for thinking that the Clintons are the Boss of Epstein. Well, now that Q linked it all in drop 3050, everyone is settled with this point.
Now, in the general thread, I’ve been trying to say that P = C = Killary. I got myself the same reaction from anons; some even told me that I don’t know what I’m talking about because they found out that P = Pope.
I can see why anons think P = Pope. But I do have one heck of problem when it comes to that theory: “P” whoever that is, is “untouchable”, he/she is protected by everyone else, right? But when you look at the POPES in plural, mostly the past ones, you will see that they were “NOT UNTOUCHABLE”……. The most recent example of that is when Benedict was ousted by Francis. If Benedict was untouchable, how the heck did Francis managed to push him aside and take his place? That doesn’t make sense to me anons.
The John Paul II was shot, almost killed. That was no play and certainly not a comedy. Here is a list of MURDERED POPES:
• John VIII (872–882): Allegedly poisoned and then clubbed to death[9]
• Stephen VI (896–897): Strangled[10]
• Leo V (903): Allegedly strangled[11]
• John X (914–928): Allegedly smothered with pillow[12]
• John XII (955–964): Allegedly murdered by the jealous husband of the woman with whom he was in bed[13]
• Benedict VI (973–974): Strangled[14]
• John XIV (983–984): Either by starvation, ill-treatment or direct murder[15]
• Clement II (1046–1047): Allegedly poisoned[16]
• Celestine V (1294, died 1296): Allegedly murdered while in post-abdication captivity; allegations blame his successor, Pope Boniface VIII[17]
• Boniface VIII (1294–1303): Allegedly (though unlikely) from the effects of ill-treatment one month before[18]
Look how far it goes back anons. So tell me if P (the absolute head of the cabal) was the Pope, how come are they assasinated this way through out history? And look at those 2 popes:
• Pope John I (Saint), Elected August 13, 523, during the Ostrogothic occupation of the Italian peninsula. Was sent as an envoy by Ostrogoth king Theodoric to Constantinople. Upon return, Theodoric accused John I of conspiracy with the Byzantine empire. Imprisoned and starved to death on 18 May 526. [4]
• Pope Martin I (Saint) Elected in 649. Died in exile 655-9-16
One was imprisoned and starved to death while the other was exiled. Doest this seem like the head of a cult that is millenials old? Not to me anons. And on top of everything, the Rothschild banking family (french branch) OWNS the Holy See. If the Pope was the head, shouldn’t the Rothschilds “work” for him? Shouldn’t they be his “servants”? I see this the other way around, as in because the Holy See is literally owned by the Rothschild, the Pope became the servant of the person pulling the strings “behind” through the Rothschilds. This theory of P = Pope doesn’t hold up for me anons.
-1-