Maxine Walter - Ethical Questions
Waters ethics case debacle detailed
By JOHN BRESNAHAN 09/25/2012 05:53 PM EDT
The long saga of the Maxine Waters ethics investigation is a chronicle of mistakes, partisan and intraparty squabbles, allegations of racism, bitter personal rivalries and failed attempts to bring the investigation to a close months and even years before it ended.
The Ethics Committee’s probe of the California congresswoman’s dealings with a minority-owned bank in which her husband held stock dragged on 38 months and consumed probably millions in legal fees — far more than the roughly $350,000 investment that Waters’s husband, Sidney Williams, was in danger of losing if OneUnited Bank collapsed during the 2008 U.S. financial crisis.
https://www.politico.com/story/2012/09/report-details-waters-ethics-case-debacle-081665
Maxine Waters
Representative (D - CA)
Financial Services, Ranking Member
https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/summary?cid=N00006690&cycle=2018
First Election: 1990
Next Election: 2018
TOP INDUSTRIES 2017 - 2018
Insurance
$121,380
Securities & Investment
$95,442
TOP CONTRIBUTORS 2017 - 2018
Marvin Engineering
$16,000
Rock Holdings
$14,200
Top Contributors, 2017 - 2018
Contributor Total Individuals PACs
Marvin Engineering $16,000 $16,000 $0
Rock Holdings $14,200 $9,200 $5,000
Inglewood $12,900 $12,900 $0
State Farm Insurance $11,000 $1,000 $10,000
Ariel Investments $10,800 $10,800 $0
Top Industries, 2017 - 2018
Industry Total Individuals PACs
Insurance $121,380 $2,380 $119,000
Securities & Investment $95,442 $50,942 $44,500
Real Estate $85,574 $24,574 $61,000
Lawyers/Law Firms $66,426 $49,426 $17,000
TV/Movies/Music $46,837 $33,837 $13,000
Source of Funds (Campaign Committee), 2017 - 2018
Type Amount Percentage
Small Individual Contributions (< $200) $75,302 4.73%
Large Individual Contributions $509,330 32.01%
PAC Contributions* $564,351 35.46%
Candidate self-financing $0 0.00%
Other $442,410 27.80%
https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/other-data?cid=N00006690&cycle=2018
Anon thoughts:
She is hiding a "bone" of investments into companies either through her husband or family. Her position on the Financial Services committee gives her insight, especially into companies facing, or will be facing legislation (both good and bad for the company).
I bet the bone is insider trading.