>>5148159

Anons,

Where exactly are you seeing this "2201 Kirk" data point tied to M. Waters?

See a different perspective and want to take your perspective into consideration before I upload an image.

>>5148405

Anons,

Where are you correlating the politican to the "2201 Kirk" address? Have a different perspective.

>>5148434

Anon,

Show me where "2201 Kirk" is affiliated with the person of interest. Data points show NO association to the person of interest.

Point me to your source / sauce? Think Anons are going down a wrong rabbit hole.

>>5148498

Anons, how is this notable? How is the person on the deed tied to the person of interest?

>>5148526

Anons,

The financial disclosure has to be wrong. The property taxes where not paid by parties other than the person of interest. It sold in a tax resale to another person other than the person of interest.

>>5148568

Anons,

If you look at the title chain it does not reflect the person of interest in the last 20 years. How is the person reflected on the deed the one in the same if the person of interest?

Could it be a mistake on the financial disclosure?

>>5148623

>>5148623

>>5148623

Not Skilling… anons should give "due care and consideration" and let the data speak for itself.

Why is there an ambiguity in the data points?

>>5148653

>>5148653

>>5148653

Another Anon has another perspective

See >>5148616