dChan
Anonymous ID: e9849b Feb. 12, 2019, 5:28 p.m. No.5148783   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8801

AC on CNN right now is asking his guests

" Does it really matter if there is no direct collusion, you have indictments and arrests"

The guest responded " Absolutely not, you can still indict on circumstantial evidence"

Anonymous ID: e9849b Feb. 12, 2019, 5:30 p.m. No.5148801   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5148783 ( me ) I would like to highlight the carefully worded exchange. "No direct collusion" ignoring the word evidence and the response said "circumstantial evidence". This should be illegal because it is blatant word manipulation to present a false narrative.

Anonymous ID: e9849b Feb. 12, 2019, 6:03 p.m. No.5149223   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Dan Bongino

‏

Verified account

 

@dbongino

5m5 minutes ago

More Dan Bongino Retweeted Ed Markey

This is hysterical! Only using backwards liberal logic does it equate that voting on a measure equals “an attempt to sabotage” it. This is classic liberal buffoonery.