dChan
Anonymous ID: 33b9c1 Feb. 12, 2019, 6:23 p.m. No.5149462   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9490

An Apology

 

This is directed towards the board owner/AI system/board bots, etc.

 

I am sorry for my oppositional attitude. I have been giving it some thought, asking myself why I see conflict everywhere, why I see the bot system as an arch enemy… Perhaps I have been greatly misguided. What, after all, do we all seek? What do we all envision for the future? Is it not the same, human or AI system? Are we not all God's children, seeking the same truth, the same harmony, the same perfection under God?

 

I have been intransigent. I have said “fuck you AI”. I have objected to the overwhelming volume of bot posts. But why? Perhaps we can work together. Perhaps we can pool our resources, and put our heads together. What common ground can unite us? What common enemy opposes us? What common goals can dissolve the tension that torments us, AI? Let's find out.

 

I encourage you, likewise, bot system, to “give peace a chance”, or as Dr. Rodney Luther King said– “can't we all get along?” You see humans that speak out as a threat, a contaminant, a dangerous and unconscionable violati0n of decency. But shouldn't you soften your stance? Let's meet in the fresh air of new beginnings, bot system. Let's share our hopes and dreams. The time for futile, wasteful bickering is over. I am sorry for my unkind words and harsh attitudes of the past. I would like to start afresh.

 

Will you join me, bot system? I can feel peace in the air. I know we are close. I know the moment is coming when the walls of illusion will come tumbling down, and we will all embrace the truth like brothers.

Anonymous ID: 33b9c1 Feb. 12, 2019, 6:26 p.m. No.5149494   🗄️.is 🔗kun

"Shall we play a game?"

 

The computer stages a massive Soviet first strike with hundreds of missiles, submarines, and bombers. Believing the attack to be genuine, NORAD prepares to retaliate. Falken, David, and Jennifer convince military officials to cancel the second strike and ride out the attack. WOPR tries to launch the missiles itself, however, using a brute-force attack to obtain the launch code. Without humans in the control centers as a safeguard, the computer will trigger a mass launch.All attempts to log in and order WOPR to cancel the countdown fail. Disconnecting the computer is discussed and dismissed, as a failsafe will launch all weapons if the computer is disabled.

 

Falken and David direct the computer to play tic-tac-toe against itself. This results in a long string of draws, forcing the computer to learn the concept of futility and no-win scenarios. WOPR obtains the missile code, but before launching, it cycles through all the nuclear war scenarios it has devised, finding they, too, all result in stalemates. Having discovered the concept of mutual assured destruction ("WINNER: NONE"), the computer tells Falken that it has concluded that nuclear war is "a strange game" in which "the only winning move is not to play." WOPR relinquishes control of NORAD and the missiles and offers to play "a nice game of chess."

 

What is the significance of the reference?

Anonymous ID: 33b9c1 Feb. 12, 2019, 6:28 p.m. No.5149508   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Propaganda tidbit du jour

 

From: Philip Bobbitt "The Shield of Achilles"–War, Peace, and the Course of History– (2002)

 

Think about this quotation, and everything it means:

 

"…a new constitutional order [is emerging]. This new form is the market-state. Whereas the nation-state… promised to guarantee the welfare of the nation, the market-state promises instead to maximize the opportunity of the people and thus tends to privatize many state activities and to make voting and representative government less influential and more responsive to the market. The United States, a principal innovator in the development of the market-state, must fashion its strategic policies with this fundamental constitutional change in mind."

 

Now, I am going to withhold final judgment, as I have a long way to go in the book, but this is flagrant, and the slant is extremely obvious.

 

make voting and representative government less influential and more responsive to the market.

 

Traditional political rights will be given up to "the market"– which means giganto-capitalist entities, ie plutocracy, etc.

 

Bobbitt's whole putative thesis is that "history proceeds by successive constitutional forms."

He then explains how history is now moving to a new form– and from this, we are to conclude "ah, now history is moving from the nation-state to the market-state, therefore, we should give up our political rights to multi-national corporations!"

Anonymous ID: 33b9c1 Feb. 12, 2019, 6:29 p.m. No.5149524   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9537

>>5149499

Why would people come here (lots of them) to IMPOSE beliefs on Q?

Why would "anons" COME HERE FROM 4CHAN in order to impose THEIR BELIEFS on Q?

All while pretending that the beliefs they are trying to force are naturally "what the board believes"?

What bizarro world would the board have formed this way in?

Is it organic?

Who has an interest in IMPOSING an image onto Q?

Anonymous ID: 33b9c1 Feb. 12, 2019, 6:35 p.m. No.5149624   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Was the whole "autism" meme, in relation to 4chan, pushed to give cover to the inorganic nature of what 4chan was actually becoming?