>>5149466 (lb)
>Anons believe Q, word for word.
False. Anons view Q as a source of information, the veracity of which has to be discerned on an individual basis. Anons view Q as Patriots, but this is warfare.
> but outright confirmation (Q&A with Trump and MSM) still hasn't happened. If total awakening is going to happen,
The shows not over yet either. The credits always play at the end of the movies.
>it could setup a scenario where folks just trust Q and replace MSM with Q drops and half-assumed open-source news articles written by the George Webbs of the world.
That's not the point. Thinking for yourself is the point. Trusting yourself is the point. Nobody real looks to Q as a magic genie.
>The point I'm getting at, here, is credibility is still lacking a bit, in the eyes of the hard skeptics, and even after that, scrutinizing sources is going to become so I tense that many will be begging for current day MSM to return and tell them what to think.
At this point in the game anyone who ignores the mountain of evidence is an operator or caught in the narrative. And that's setting aside what I've already written above.
You know why? Because at this point, anons understand that THEY are the news now, operator. And you can't stop it.
You couldn't stop it last February, nevermind now. And you fucking know it.