Anonymous ID: 023a4d April 19, 2019, 12:30 p.m. No.6242183   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2442

mueller report pp186-191

tldr / partially redacted: trump tower meeting w/ manafort kushner don jr. is a scenario that in itself is not a violation of election law, yes they met with foriegners under pretense of an offer of value, no nothing / no info / no promise or monies changed hands….. redacted redacted redacted….

 

check the pic its related. grain of salt, generally with this source, but think logically and you can guyz will arrive at the conclusion before yous even see it in print further down the page.

 

Most critical to note about Special Counsel Mueller’s legal reasoning and ruling not to charge Donald Trump Jr. for meeting with Natalya Veselnitskaya on 9 June 2016, this report continues, was Fiona Hill explaining to President Putin that it in no way whatsoever applied to Hillary Clinton—as unlike Trump Jr., she had actually paid millions-of-dollars to blatantly conspire with foreign nationals to affect the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential Election—and is why, as outlined on pages 189-191 of the Mueller Report [not viewable to the American people], Special Counsel Muellerturned over the criminal case against Hillary Clinton to the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) this past January-2019—whose first act was to criminally charge Natalya Veselnitskaya with obstruction of justice—who today remains a wanted fugitive from US justice as Russia has no extradition treaty with the United States—and whose further 14 other criminal indictments are yet to be revealed.

 

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2846.htm

Anonymous ID: 023a4d April 19, 2019, 12:47 p.m. No.6242442   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2496

>>6242183

ill even add one to it… hilldawgs campaign hq was where? NYC matter of jurisdiction for SDNY. Further there is mention in the article of mention in the report that some matter like scienter of mens rea would need be established and often difficult to do. would withholding from the fbi news that the dnc had been 'hacked' long enough for the trump tower meeting to occur (same immediate timeframe)? constitute circumstantial evidence of mens rea if admitted into court? I wonder how they would get such a matter into evidence?? :)