Brennan Slams Trump's "Sociopathic Ramblings" That Mueller Probe Was CIA-Backed Coup

Even after the Mueller report confirmed 'conspiratorial' allegations levied by critics of the American Deep State that the FBI's investigation into Trump-Russia collusion was based on specious FISA warrants, the drunken ramblings of George Papadopoulos and the discredited, Democrat-financed and (ironically) Russia-assisted 'Steele Dossier', Obama-era intelligence officials have continued to insist that Trump's criticisms of the intelligence community are rooted in nothing but his own lust for power and self-preservation.

And even though operatives like Peter Strzok haven't exactly jumped to answer more questions about the early days of the investigation, and the appearance of deep-seated anti-Trump biases among the investigators, John Brennan, Obama's former CIA director, who has had his security clearance revoked and being exposed for lying to Congress, continue to insist that a "continued investigation" would clear them of any suspicion - which sounds great if it weren't for the fact that Mueller's own conclusions found no evidence of collusion or evidence that Trump successfully obstructed justice, regardless of what he may or may not have told White House lawyers and aides.

So, after Trump lashed out at Brennan during a Thursday interview with Fox's Sean Hannity, Brennan, a favorite of cable news show producers, appeared on his favorite cable news channel, MSNBC, where he is a paid contributor, to rebut the claims.

In another rambling interview, Brennan bashed Trump's "sociopathic" ramblings about the "coup" as self-serving nonsense. But didn't exactly offer up any actual evidence to rebut these claims.

"I don’t think it’s surprising at all that we continue to hear the sociopathic ramblings of Mr. Trump claiming that there was this effort to try to prevent him from being elected or to unseat him," Brennan said.

"I welcome any type of, you know, continued investigation in terms of what we did during that period of time when we were in government," he continued. "And I've testified in front of Congress, and I'd be happy to do it again."

For context, Trump told Hannity that the Mueller probe was a conspiracy against his administration that was "bigger than Watergate." During the interview, Trump called out Brennan by name, as well as James Comey, James Clapper and Andrew McCabe.

"This was a coup. This was an attempted overthrow of the United States government,” Trump said. “Bigger than Watergate, because it means so much. This was a coup. This wasn’t stealing information from an office in the Watergate apartments, this was an attempted coup."

Of course, Brennan failed to acknowledge the fact that the FBI literally installed a paid asset, Stefan Halper, to infiltrate the Trump campaign.

But if, as Brennan says, the intelligence community would welcome an investigation into what exactly motivated the Mueller probe, then what's the problem? Maybe Brennan and others could volunteer to appear in front of Congress, and save them the Democrats the trouble and political backlash from subpeona-ing the 'good guys'?

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-27/brennan-slams-trumps-sociopathic-ramblings-mueller-probe-was-cia-backed-coup

Yellow Vests take to the streets in rejection of Macron’s ‘rubbish’ olive branch

Unrelenting Yellow Vest activists have marched in Paris and other French cities for the 24th straight weekend, just days after Emmanuel Macron tried to placate the protest movement with promises of lower taxes.

The demonstrators who assembled in Paris, Toulouse and Strasbourg on Saturday appear to signal that despite the French president’s recent concessions to the group, the Yellow Vest movement is alive and well.

https://www.rt.com/news/457710-yellow-vest-24-macron-taxes/

In the Land of the Free: Child Sex Trafficking Now Fastest Growing Business in Organized Crime

Children are being targeted and sold for sex in America every day.”—John Ryan, National Center for Missing & Exploited Children

(Rutherford Institute) Children, young girls—some as young as 9 years old—are being bought and sold for sex in America. The average age for a young woman being sold for sex is now 13 years old.

This is America’s dirty little secret.

Sex trafficking—especially when it comes to the buying and selling of young girls—has become big business in America, the fastest growing business in organized crime and the second most-lucrative commodity traded illegally after drugs and guns.

As investigative journalist Amy Fine Collins notes, “It’s become more lucrative and much safer to sell malleable teens than drugs or guns. A pound of heroin or an AK-47 can be retailed once, but a young girl can be sold 10 to 15 times a day—and a ‘righteous’ pimp confiscates 100 percent of her earnings.”

Consider this: every two minutes, a child is exploited in the sex industry.

According to USA Today, adults purchase children for sex at least 2.5 million times a year in the United States.

Who buys a child for sex? Otherwise ordinary men from all walks of life.

“They could be your co-worker, doctor, pastor or spouse,” writes journalist Tim Swarens, who spent more than a year investigating the sex trade in America.

In Georgia alone, it is estimated that 7,200 men (half of them in their 30s) seek to purchase sex with adolescent girls each month, averaging roughly 300 a day.

On average, a child might be raped by 6,000 men during a five-year period of servitude.

It is estimated that at least 100,000 children—girls and boys—are bought and sold for sex in the U.S. every year, with as many as 300,000 children in danger of being trafficked each year. Some of these children are forcefully abducted, others are runaways, and still others are sold into the system by relatives and acquaintances.

“Human trafficking—the commercial sexual exploitation of American children and women, via the Internet, strip clubs, escort services, or street prostitution—is on its way to becoming one of the worst crimes in the U.S.,” said prosecutor Krishna Patel.

This is an industry that revolves around cheap sex on the fly, with young girls and women who are sold to 50 men each day for $25 apiece, while their handlers make $150,000 to $200,000 per child each year.

More

https://thefreethoughtproject.com/children-trafficking-fastest-growing-industry/

Who checks the fact-checkers? Facebook leaves verification to groups funded by Soros, US Congress

In its crusade against 'fake news', Facebook has vowed to fight for impartiality. However, when it comes to fact-checking, it seems to rely on sources, which have links to the US government, and renowned political meddlers.

For more than two years, the social media giant has been seeking to convince the public that it does its best to take a stand against malicious disinformation spread through its network and presented a whole bunch of instruments aimed at revealing and countering false narratives.

It appears, though, that Facebook heavily relies on decisions taken by some third-parties in its 'anti-disinformation' policy.

Submissions from the so-called fact-checkers – alongside some feedback from users – seem to be the primary source on which Facebook relies when saying a post is 'false'.

One-fits-all solution?

Facebook proudly boasted that all the "partners" it cooperates with were "certified" through what it calls "the non-partisan International Fact-Checking Network" or IFCN.

However, the social network's choice of people to trust with the power to decide what is true or false does raise questions. This seemingly impressive "international network" Facebook mentions is a project run by Florida-based private school of journalism – the Poynter Institute for Media Studies.

The project, which Facebook apparently uses as a sole instrument to find trustworthy "partners," seems to be way more than just a selfless initiative aimed at helping people navigate through questionable information.

The IFCN was launched in 2015 following a generous donation totaling $300,000, which the Poynter Institute received from two sources. One of them is the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) – a "soft-power" organization, which is funded primarily through annual allocations from the US Congress. Another one is the Omidyar Network – a foundation run by the eBay founder and self-described "progressive" billionaire Pierre Omidyar.

Although he has not yet apparently gained as much fame – or infamy for that matter – as another US billionaire and renowned political meddler, George Soros, Omidyar has also lately shown himself as a major patron of regime-change operations. As early as in 2014, the US media reported that Omidyar supported anti-government groups in Ukraine that opposed the then President Viktor Yanukovych, who was ousted during Maidan.

A report by Forbes also suggested that the billionaire was one of the major funders of the Kiev-based Hromadske TV, which harbored anti-Russian views while backing the violent 2014 coup. Most recently, a group of journalists revealed that Omidyar funds a wide range of media outlets through foundations, nonprofits and other cutouts that in fact promote the liberal interventionist agenda.

https://www.rt.com/news/457713-facebook-fact-checkers-soros-funding/

>>6334889

^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NOW?

>>6334984

You mean 'dirt'

>>6335075

>>6335075

Dump it all this week one day after another. Please