RED TEXTThe "N" in "NWO" means perhaps, and it would be really big:
RED TEXTNYMZA or NJMZA
This is what makes me think that the "N" means "NYMZA":
Q started to bring up the topic "Nazis" for the very first time on Mar 10th 2018:
This is pretty late when you consider that Q has been covering important historical topics for months and that the 3rd Reich is so super prominent in our official historical narrative and that it left a big footprint on our world. Why would Q do that? What if the topic of the 3rd Reich contains a "door" that leads deep into the rabbit hole, maybe too deep for us even now? I don't say this because we couldn't handle the gravity of the information, we can! I say this because at the moment we wouldn't find the "door" and instead would accidently go into a dead end since we lack additional information and/or connections, and that is exactly what happened. Q dropped crumbs leading to this door by mentioning the Nazis in conjunction with the NWO, but especially, and this is the BIG BOMBSHELL, by revealing that the "N" in "NWO" does not refer to "New" in this post:
>> 618129
By saying "NWO [N does not refer to “New”] and mentioning Nazis at the same time, we (maybe not all) would of course come up ERRONEOUSLY with the term "Nazi World Order" and miss the really important "door". I think Q quickly realized that dropping crumbs leading to this door was still prematurely and "Attempted a pullback ("N does not refer to Nazi.") here:
Since this crumb about the meaning of "N" is so intriguing, many kept speculating but didn't get anywhere. Q didn't want us to waste time on this any longer and tried to end our futile efforts, including "Natürliche WirtschaftsOrdnung" for example:
As a side note, unfortunately, if you mouseover "NWO" at https:// qanon.pub/ a tooltip will now pop up saying "Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung", which is incorrect. If it had been correct, Q would neither have said "Not Ready." nor "We went too deep."
So, what does the "N" mean? As it is so often, if someone attempts a pullback, the pullback itself will provide more information about what someone tried to pull back from. They key phrase is "Think subgroup.":
The subgroup here are the Nazis themselves, which means that there is a higher-ranking group. More important than the subgroup itself is the ideology it carries, especially since Q said "The continued Nazi ideology is relevant.". It is relevant since the ideology still exists to this day, because the higher-ranking group has continued to exist! What is this higher-ranking group? Let's look at the roots of the Nazis. The Nazis and their 3rd Reich succeeded and grew from the 2nd Reich. Is there a powerfull german group influencing this 2nd Reich, equipped with money, knowledge and technology? Yes, someone found evidence for it. In a heap in the gutter were found old technical illustrations and records by Charles A.A. Dellschau (1830 - 1923) of the "Sonora Aero Club" which a groupy called "Nymza" had oversight of. Luckily for us someone already connected the dots of this area of the map we are building and made a brilliant presentation:
https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijA7atHnm8M
Buckle up anons, this goes into the breakaway civilization. We are talking here about advanced technology, antigravity, gold, mysticism alchemy and more.