>>638260

The "Natural Economic Order" was NOT acknowledged by Q. It was mentioned in a post

where Q replied without mentioning the book at all. I wish the anon pushing this would re-

evaluate. I am happy you got a Q ( you ), but please go back and realize Q did NOT say your

suggestion was correct. He took the opportunity to address "We went too deep."

>>639907

Then you go read it, azzhat. Prove that Q acknowledged the tome.

>>639942

Oh, I'm sorry. You ARE retarded. Q said "We went too deep." I guess in your world, that means

"Confirmed" as Q has said previously when Q confirmed something. My apologies for using words

you don't understand. Won't happen again.

>>639935

I'll type it slowly. That is not a confirmation of the book. Do not let confirmation bias color your

perception.