>>6623922 pb

Agree entirely. No rush, no push. Just trying to attune to what presents itself each day and respond if a response is needed. But point of info: Every time I trace it back, the "board weirdness" goes back to when previous BO left. E.g., shortly thereafter, BV wiped out half my notables around 600+ one night trying to get rid of spam, because someone was posting a shitload of news items and somehow it was seen as spam? Nothing like that ever happened before. I was new baker; took me a while to figure it out. BV could have explained but did not; anons explained instead. Really strange.

Regarding the benefit of the doubt:

I would normally give the benefit of the doubt to those I don't know, but I've been personally attacked twice now by BO and today by BV. Can document it fully.

So the one thing I know is that they are not what I'd call "stand up guys." Zero respect for that kind of behavior, especially from those who occupy positions of power and responsibility. I did reserve judgement for over a month. Would never have brought these matters up on the main board, where it might disrupt the work. It was they who did so, and did so without dignity or honor.

This board is about the preservation of the Constitution and our traditional values and freedoms. It is NOT anti-Semitic. Any negative comments about Jews or Jewish culture are the creation of shills who wish to undermine our work.

>>6624068

Do you ever post lb notes in current notes? I do sometimes, often in response to anon requests. There's no particular reason not to; once someone clicks on the link, doesn't matter where it's actually located. I keep the PB on there so phone-fags don't wind up down some rabbit hole.

>>6624107

There could be moar, but the gist is here:

>>6622029

No specific idea why I got singled out, only unsubstantiated theories. But what matters is this:

If it can happen to me, it can happen to other anons.

This must not go on.

>>6622319 pb

you can move your Information Warfare thread over to /comms/ if you want. I'll make sure your thread doesn't get removed''

I missed this response PB. If the poster is on this bread, plz get back to me, it would be a great relief to know the thread if safe.

>>6624302

So do I, but I'm right in the middle, since BO keeps gunning for me.

>>6624616

Thx much for having my back, can say how much, really.

On a ghost bake, there are few is any noms. Often not so many noms on a regular bake. One guy arrived late in a bake recently and went thru the bread finding several excellent posts, which he nom'd. And I added. Would be great if it were always like that. Instead, I take all noms that arent' shills, add other worthy stuff, and then ask for anons for input. Works well, except with shills, who can object to anything.

>>6624614

Thx, anon, more than I can say.

>>6624636

Thx much. Not sure how to post the entire thread but it's archived so I assume there's a way.