Thank you to anon who pointed me to this thread. I'm reposting this from qr general:

I may have a new perspective on the '43 confirmed connections' mentioned in Q225.

I have programmatically connected 43 drops (made pre-Q225) to Trump tweets during the same time period by extracting the capital letters from Trump's tweets and matching them against the capital letters in Q drops.

The same logic can be applied to all drops past Q225 as well, but I'm just trying to validate the first 43 to see if the theory holds water.

To me, the resulting statistic indicate there may be something here:

For time period 2017-10-28 through 2017-11-24:

227 drops by Q

227 tweets by Trump

There are 43 Q Drops that map to 30 Trump Tweets:

23 drops map uniquely 1:1 drop:tweet

17 drops map to the same tweet

3 drops map to multiple tweets

Maybe it's nothing, but I started to pay closer attention when I saw:

17

23

227:227 Trump:Q

43 drops connected to tweets, to the day, that Q stated 43 confirmed connections.

In attempting to decode the connections myself, I have found there is a common theme among the tweets for the cases where one drop maps to multiple tweets.

One example would be the 'Fake News' theme in Connection 5 (C:05) which connects Q33 with:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/918457595618365441

"The Fake News Is going all out in order to demean and denigrate! Such hatred!"

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/918061437750267904

"It would be really nice if the Fake News Media would report the virtually unprecedented Stock Market growth since the election.Need tax cuts"

However, I have not found any obvious themes that match between drop and tweet, which is why I'm asking for help - in the hopes that someone else may see something obvious that I'm missing completely.

Given the numbers and Q225, I think there is something to this, but who knows, maybe it's all a coincidence.

DATA:

pastebin with proposed connections:

https://pastebin.com/SjWBWXC0

URLs to qmap and tweets are included for each connection

REQUESTS:

1. Peer review of my logic

2. Help in decoding the 43 connections I've generated

3. Pointers (specific or general), to any previous research.

I have gone through each result for '43 connections' on qresear.ch and from what I can tell this is a new approach that has not been looked at before. However, the full archives appear to be offline, so I am unable to see each result in context.

DISCLAIMERS:

1. I realize there are multiple meanings. This is just one possible interpretation.

2. I'm not pushing this idea as right or wrong just looking for help to validate/invalidate the idea.

>>>/qresearch/7858466

I think this anons take is probably correct - there may not be any more information left to discover here.

>>7860863

>It's here it's on twitter it's everywhere

It literally is everywhere, and this is what makes things so easy and difficult at the same time. You never know when to stop. It's impossible to Depth-First-Search on everything because you don't know when the information stops or when you need to keep going.

You can't Bread-First-Search everything, because you'll miss the deeper meanings and encoded information.

What I really should have stated in my post was: "I think this anon has a reasonable take - the connections have established a link between tweets and drops, and my time may be better spent elsewhere than trying to get every last drop out of this specific decode".

But who knows! Maybe this example is packed with information and I'll miss out because I stopped looking at it!

Clock Confirmation: "Best Is Yet To Come"

>>7861168

Not sure if anyone else has thought of this, but I just now noticed that the minute mark is at 22 in this graphic, and the day of the month is the 22nd.

Perhaps that's how we should identify the specific date to look at from the set of possible dates on the clock?

For minutes 30, simply subtract 30. So, if minute mark was 58, then you would look for a day on the 28th of the month.

Checked in on 3 random dates and saw this logic match up in each case.

>>7861245

>did we time warp? this is bread #10 WTF

Sorry, I followed a link from another anon and didn't check the bread number, so I guess I bumped an old bread.

Tangentially related, I a warp of sorts did happen with the general breads this morning. Refreshed looking for #10058 and everything changed to the #900s, refreshed again and it was back to normal.

>>7861287

Not TextAnon, but I have been absent for quite a few months. I'll be around. I have a few other drops that I need to make graphics for.

>>7861379

Exactly!

>>7861379

Looks like we just got a POTUS tweet at 8:24 - will check to see if there are any content matches.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1219430494460268544

>>7863374

And we have two at 8:26 which, applying equivalent logic, would be valid for the Q-line.

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1219430958769664002

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1219431143067377664

So for today, the following dates would come into play:

nominal: 2019-07-24

mirror: 2019-02-24

qline: 2019-07-26

>>7863410

This is my clock output for reference

>>7866144

Thank you! This is excellent feedback.

>"Peer review" sounds quite weird, so this is no such thing

I agree, it sounds weird. I simply used "peer review" because the baker at the time used that language when asking me to rewrite and repost.

>Not for all of the 43 posts and 30 tweets capital letters are listed/available (17 out of 47)

Yes, those are the "17 drops made to same tweet", based on a "zero" match

>while the last matching Q post has a timestamp outside of it.

I think this is the dealbreaker, and pretty much invalidates any substance I thought I may have found. Thank you for catching it! You've saved me a lot of time looking into something that isn't there.

>I've put "jewish" in quotes, for one because I'm not sure that's the correct term for it, and second because original hebrew gematria would have to be transscribed in a different way

I completely agree. Is there a better term? bastardized-gematrix-jewish?

>while it is not true for timestamps in UTC

This is an interesting point. I know others have done a lot of work in UTC but always worked with EST. If there's information there, I'll have to expand my horizons.

Thank you anon. Valuable (to me) feedback, and it is much appreciated.

>>7868337

>I haven't build the matrix yet in order to check if there's any other timespan for which that would be true as well

That shouldn't be too hard to do. I'll put it near the top of my list.

>All your other posts around here look interesting as well, so if you can, please stay around and post some moar of your ideas if you have/get them

I'll stick around. It is very nice having an actual conversation about these things and being able to bounce ideas back and forth.

>>7861209

This idea is what I'm working on next. It too should not be hard to validate/invalidate since we have plenty of data.

Yesterday we had one Trump tweet match the mirror minute.

Today, so far, we've had one Trump tweet match the mirror minute and two retweets that matched the nominal minute.

I have not looked for matches to q drops for the 2/25 and 2/26 dates.

Busy day today, but I still plan to look back at old data to see if this pattern holds.

>>7875817

>There's no mention of a clock involved to find them

Q literally said "Think Clock. Wind the clock w/ all markers"

>>7880585

nice.

>Q said, “WH clean SIG” on 4-2-2018

Another case where qmap.pub has a different timestamp.

I've been using https://qanon.pub/data/json/posts.json

but it looks like I need to stop using that if the timestamps are often wrong.

Anyone have another json (or similar) source for drops with the correct times?

>>7883040

Hmm. On my "hour-based qclock", which tracks hours in addition to minutes, Friday January 24, 2020 is Hour 0 Minute 58.

If we are "2 days ahead of schedule", maybe that means something?

>>7885931

>For pure data analysis, the "HTMLonly" version is sufficient

Awesome - Thank you!

>>7886550

>So, hour = 0, minute = 0, = January 26?

It would be hour=1, minute=0 for the 26th.

But I wouldn't put too much stock into it. My hourbased concept hasn't really been vetted.

I probably shouldn't have said anything, but now that I have, I may as well continue on. 2020-01-26 would map to 2018-02-05. There are more references to archive offline for that day, and SOTU, and a note about the superbowl, so it seems relevant timewise, but I don't see anything that's a clear reference to 'storm'.

>>7891306

This sounds like a giant shit show.

How is it that we have all these wonderful tools and great discussion, yet still don't have an accurate and complete data set of drops?!

I may have to take this on as a new project. It won't be enjoyable, but it is necessary, right?

This one might be a stretch - just working on my Tweet timestamp -qclock idea and tossing this out there …

>>7868337

>I haven't build the matrix yet in order to check if there's any other timespan for which that would be true as well

>>7871844

> Post your results, once you've done it

Ok, I've done a first pass at this and am posting the data since I won't have time to analyze it today.

Format is a csv where each row represents the "start day" from which to start counting, and each column represents the "end day" at which to stop counting. Both are inclusive.

Each cell value is in the format: "tweet_count:drop_count"

If it is easier, I can generate two matrices, one for tweets and one for drops.

Time allowing, I'll obviously post-process this to only report dates where the two match.

The file was too large for pastebin, so I put it on anonfile - if there is a better way to share data please let me know and I'll start using that.

data: https://anonfile.com/V6W1u3Q7n0/matrix.2020-01-23_csv

caveats:

• drop timestamps are from the qanon.pub json file

• tweets are from TTA / deleted tweets are not counted

>>7913894

> Would be curious to see if you get similar results

> in case you hadn't noticed yet

Awesome! I'm reserving a few hours to catch up on the bread tomorrow.

>>7912740

That is quite remarkable. I'm cautiously optimistic, but it does align with some other things I've been working on that focus on the first week of February. Time will tell.

Looks like we may have a both a tweet timestamp and clock hit for "CORONA_OFFLINE" in Q713

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1223399034552930305

https://qmap.pub/read/713

Looks like Q predicted the "shadow" fiasco 330 days in advance.

>>8021952

Rand Paul also talked of Snowden in his 10-minute slot at the impeachment today.

My clock/tweet decode of the day:

"Trump administration working on a surveillance solution that RESPECTS and PROTECTS the people."

>>8067745

Trump just tweeted about a "Red Carpet" today:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1226214925246324736

Another tweet->clock decode for today points to executive order on election interference.

>>8076015

>I have that post at :12 so didn't connect it on the QClock

I think it does line up on the QLine mirror, right?

Not sure what terminology you all use, but by "QLine mirror" I mean the mirror that folds over minute 25 which, for minute 12 would put it at minute 38.

>>8076247

>Which one are you referring to?

I was referring to the 2/7 "Let's roll" USMC tweet which falls on minute 12, and 9/11 falls on minute 38.

>Usually call :55 to :25 the comms confirmed mirror line

Thanks! I'll use that term from now on.

>>8076772

nice work anon

>>8076772

Sunday 2/9 is also "National Pizza Day".

Q1215, posted on 4/20/2018, talks of Alefantis and pizza.

4/20 falls on minute 14 as well.

Sorry for continuing to add clutter to your very nice graphic :)

Someone non-q-related commented about 24 hour clocks being more intuitive the other day.

Got me thinking. Could it be that simple?

Original sun clocks were to track position of the sun around the earth. Each hour would be where the sun is located. A map of sorts.

Then we have Q's post yesterday about prepping for the storm, which fell on the :25 :55 comms confirmed line. This matches up with 2017-11-02 or the day before the 11.3 First Marker.

Looking at a 24-hour clock would put the 17th hour surrounding the 2020 election on 11.3

There are several POTUS overseas trips (AF1 marker), both before and after the 2020 election, that fall in the 17th hour.

Public not yet ready to comprehend that coronavirus is a hoax?

Did Trump attempt a pullback until the appropriate time?

>>8296108

>dates counting up from 10/08/17 [=0]

Can you remind me of the significance of 10/08/17?

>>8496028

>I hope tomorrow is 55 tweet.

I was hopeful too :(

On my hour-based qclock (e.g. dates on 01:23 map to 13:23), for 2020-03-26 which maps to 2018-04-06, there are some hints of a net shutdown.

Couple that with the news that youtube/amazon/netflix are reducing bandwidth to prevent internet overload and …

What do you all think.

Did Q intentionally let his pw go to allow the Austin Steinbart narrative attack take place in order to ultimately "force the Q to be asked"?

Taking q posts on the clock from 2020-03-24, selecting the ones that match the same minute with a Trump tweet from the same day yields drops discussing passwords being let go, and "public awareness forcing the hand".

Then there's the whole "Baby Q" thing and the fact we know that Q_ANONBaby will force the Q.

>>8604472

around the clock we go

Lots of "when does a bird sing" phrases in drops for the clock today.

>>8675157

https://twitter.com/ChristinePolon1/status/1246160756627787778

Birds start chirping in the background around 13 seconds in

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRK6hOq9-q8&t=13

Not really sure what to make of this pattern, but posting in case someone has an idea.

Trump tweets at 11:26 AM and is decoded to be related to "The full armor of God" 24 minutes later.

4 hours and 28 minutes after Trump's tweet (and 4:04 after the decode), Q drops Q3914, an image of "The Armor of God".

Following that, Q drops Q3915, at 4:28 PM.

Have we seen this before where time deltas between a Trump tweet and a Q drop yield the timestamp of the next Q drop?