Anonymous ID: 5b33bb July 31, 2019, 10:03 p.m. No.7288885   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8967

>>7288722

I suspect plenty of things are happening. DECLAS to Barr long ago. That's all that is really required, get evidence to Grand Jury. I keep thinking about the political timing involved. POTUS in Denmark thru Sept 3 could be the [ 93 dk] marker. Marker for what? Interesting to me is that Sept 3 is the Tuesday after Labor day. The House does not return to session until Sept 9. If you have indictments for House members ready, that is a powerful hand to play. We know 5 R's recently resigned. I take that as Barr calling last stop before indictments. How many D's are now stuck on the train? 40 R's jumped in 2018. It's logical to conclude that at least that many D's are at risk, yes?

Anonymous ID: 5b33bb July 31, 2019, 10:14 p.m. No.7289050   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9079

>>7288967

I view it as more of a possible set point. The house is in Recess, POTUS out of country. Big chess moves to ponder. Is it unreasonable to think there could be 40 Indictments in the House? Recess would be a good time to drop them.

Anonymous ID: 5b33bb July 31, 2019, 10:28 p.m. No.7289180   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7289079

It's hard to ignore all the R resignations though. D's maybe just stubborn or no choice but to hold on to the end. Can they get indictments with what they have? Seems like between corruption like Cummings, Intel leaks like Schiff, Kill potus on phones with whoever that was, the numbers are adding up pretty quickly. I'm unclear on this scenario. Lets presume that many indictments exist, Pelosi and 39 others for discussion. House Session starts Sept 9 with no speaker and 40 less D's. Do you elect a new speaker? Simple Majority comes into play. Vacant seat equals no vote for your district