Anonymous ID: 73ef13 Dec. 25, 2019, 2:05 p.m. No.7619834   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9836 >>9837

>>7619634

>So we had two Suns?

We use to orbit Saturn when it was a red dwarf star. So, I guess you could call it our "sun", during that period of time. However, we had a different type of orbit than we do today. We used to be a tidally locked body, where one hemisphere always faced Saturn and the other hemisphere faced away at all times, just like our moon orbits Earth today, only in these early days, our planet didn't have a moon, yet.

 

>where did our current Sun come from, was the Moon planet X/Nibiru/Wormwood?

Our current sun seems to be rather new to us. We still have a ridiculous amount to learn about our sun and how stars work. Kinda scary when you stop to think about how the spent so much time assuring us that things been there for billions of years and will still be around hundreds of millions more. Gets me rather pissed off that they are forcing kids to multiple ideologies that have absolutely no basis in reality. Almost as if someone has been imposing their false beliefs on us. Thought that was unconstitutional, last time I checked. Any who…

 

So, I'm not sure if Nibiru was based on the moon, or a different catastrophe. There were many. Same goes for wormwood. I'd have to refresh my memory on those before I have any kind of opinion. But from what I gather, the moon was the first in the series of catastrophes. Another name for the moon is "Sin", which is why I think this gets often associated with "the downfall of mankind". Prior to the moon, we had one main landmass (Pangaea), located on the far-side of the planet, facing away from Saturn at all times. Pretty sure gravity was weaker, at the time, too, which resulted in larger animals (including humans) and lighter blocks (hence the megalithic blocks of "impossible" size). This is what "myths" like the "Golden Age", Garden of Eden, and Atlantis are based on. Anyway, the moon crashed the party, and the Earth was never the same again.

 

There were additional catastrophes that followed. Most of them aren't likely to happen again. Then again, we've spent so long brainwashing people into a false uniformitarian ideology, all while hiding info about one KEY Force of Nature which applies to all these matters, it might take a very long time (if ever) to get things back on track to prepare us for whatever the next MAJOR cataclysm we will likely encounter as we continue on our cosmic journey thru space. I will say that the worst catastrophe that struck was almost certainly the moon. However, the Flood seemed to be pretty bad, too, and that likely happened from a Saturn nova (Hydrogen from Saturn mixing with Oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere). So, it's best to focus on the sun. Meteors aren't much of a threat. But we'll definitely need to study Jupiter, too. That's practically our sun's binary pair. And we'll want to pay attention to a few stars getting closer over the next 8,000 years. Just a few things to think about…

Anonymous ID: 73ef13 Dec. 25, 2019, 2:19 p.m. No.7619892   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9921

>>7619837

For Earth to Saturn connections. There's a few sources to consider. Velikovsky kicked off the festivities. Thunderbolts built more upon his work (and others).

 

https://varchive.org/itb/hydrox.htm

 

https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2018/12/30/wal-thornhill-the-saturn-earth-connection-and-our-place-in-the-universe-space-news/

 

Unbiased evidence:

https://phys.org/news/2018-12-saturn-satellites-earth-moon-phoebe.html

 

As for the moon. Velikovsky hinted some things which I came across later. Originally, I figured out that the moon crashed into our planet by looking at satellite images of Earth. There's a lot more to back this up. Some people might be saying similar things that I haven't come across. There's a few folks studying red dwarfs and considering tidal locking as a possibility to habitability. I'm saying we NEED a situation like this in order to explain things like the "Cambrian Explosion". Supporting evidence is all around. Pieces just need to be put together.

Anonymous ID: 73ef13 Dec. 25, 2019, 2:25 p.m. No.7619921   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7619892

Also, if you look at our moon, the side facing us is "shallow". So, this type of arrangement is stable, to say the least. Since our planet had water at the time, it helped shield direct exposure to the intense radiation from the flaring red dwarf, while also trapping heat, which allowed for a nice, warm ambient temperature on the side with land.