Going to "START HERE"

Anyone have any thoughts about this? Am I missing anything, or have anything incorrect?

Side_by_Side (graphic form):

^ Topic

BDT/False Flag posts vs actual news of bomb attempt (NYC)_

DEFCON 1 posts vs H scare_

[2] above represent PRIMARY indicators.

^ Anything to add here for Primary indicators?

SEC indicators = Posts:Tweets:Time

^ Secondary indicators = Posts:Tweets:Time

REMAINDER below.

START HERE. ←– Signature

WILL GUIDE. ←– Signature

Q

>>8021365

Assuming that the format for a "topic" is STUFF:

Would it be possible that a topic can be defined anywhere in a post, or just the first line of a post?

If it is just the first line of a post here is what I see as possible "topics"

BIG DROP:

Look to Twitter:

To those watching (you know who you are):

:::::Flash Traffic:::::

Correction:

Code:

Important Context:

ROTHSCHILD OWNED & CONTROLLED BANKS:

List of Republicans, in the House and Senate, who have announced they will not seek re-election:

::::WARNING::::

Keywords:

:Owls:

Board owner, mods, and other patriots:

ONE OF TWENTY TWO:

IMPORTANT:

Side_by_Side (graphic form):

JC Tweet Translation:

Timestamp:

Noted:IP-Ghost:

Fellow Patriots:

/CM/BO/:

POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):

These reporters and networks have been named in the WikiLeaks to have colluded with the DNC or Hillary campaign during the 2016 election cycle:

Focus Here:

D\'s Playbook (Midterm E):

[D] Party Con:

Edit:

Example 22A (1 of 100s):

Barr to Mueller:

Important to Remember:

TO SUMMARIZE THIS WEEK:

FOCUS HERE:

Future trip(c) re_verify:

[D] party leaders [‘Big 5’]:

>>8021365

Could it be possible that the "topic" and the "context" are the same thing?

So in this example the "topic/context" is "Side_by_Side (graphic form):"

>>8021365

Going with the assumption that the "Signature(s)" for this drop are "START HERE." "WILL GUIDE."

If we look for any drops with "WILL GUIDE.", it appears that there is only the one drop with the "topic/context".

If we look for any drops with "START HERE.", there are 2 drops, the one with the "topic/context" and then Q1557

It appears that Q1557 is "linked" to Q534 by the last line "Let's start here."

>>8021365

Continuing to look at "START HERE"

>>8021556

We are now at Q1557 where it says

">>1807979

You asked for popcorn.

Let’s start here."

Based on Q307 (image), it appears to me that…

Reference to 1807979

Marker is "popcorn"

"Signature is "start here."

Q307 (image)

">>60150

The "marker."

Learn to read the map.

News unlocks the map."

>>8021844

From what I understand, it was one time, from Florida to New York (Can't remember exactly). Was not to "The Island", and can't recall if POTUS has made a statement about why he hitched a ride.

Not sure why Alan, he is a constitutional lawyer. Has always claimed he is innocent of anything.

About all I have off the top of my head.

>>8021986

>>8022004

Could it be possible, I would assume.

Could it be possible for us to know what is actually in the box?