Anonymous ID: 316cd8 Feb. 4, 2020, 8:37 a.m. No.8021464   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8021362

In his response, Clevenger shows that the FBI argues that they redacted the emails related to Seth Rich that were recently found and sent to Judicial Watch because they donโ€™t want to disclose investigative or prosecutorial activities. >However, Clevenger argues that the FBI claimed that there was no investigation or presecution related to Seth Rich โ€“ how can they redact for this reason when they claim there was no investigation?