Anyone seeking the most and best information on UFOs, spirituality, consciousness, life, and more should consider taking a serious look at The Ra Contact. Consider reading it with a truth-seeking mentality (as in all things). I would be impressed if you were not suprised by its content, if not in agreement.
URL to The Ra Contact: https://llresearch.org/library/the_ra_contact/the_ra_contact.aspx
It's slow to download, but archive.org captured it: http://web.archive.org/web/20191215104933/http://cista.net/tomes/
While I understand they have many posts, you may also consider hiding posts by ID to not see them.
I've posted about The Ra Contact earlier in this thread and check in now-and-then.
"The cabal wants a new age of Ra worship"
Could you please provide some evidence to back up this claim? I'm open to considering the possibility.
The section of text being referred to:
2.2: "However, [Akhenaten]’s beliefs were accepted by very few. His priests gave lip service only, without the spiritual distortion towards seeking. The peoples continued in their beliefs. When this entity was no longer in this density, again the polarized beliefs in the many gods came into their own, and continued so until the one known as Muhammad delivered the peoples into a more intelligible distortion of mind/body/spirit relationships."
2.2 contains the only mention of Muhammed in the entire Ra Contact. Based on the context, I view Ra's statement as confirmation that Islam contains select aspects of the Law of One, specifically with regards to the mind/body/spirit complex. I have not studied Islam enough to assess the "more intelligible distortion" statement, though. A comparative study of the Law of One's characterization of the mind/body/spirit complex (possibly including concepts of the Tarot) with Islam's conceptualization of a person would likely shed light in this area. Much of Islam, however, appears very negatively-oriented.
Ra discusses Jesus later on:
17.11: "Jesus of Nazareth…was a member of [fourth] density of the highest level of that sub-octave. This entity was desirous of entering this planetary sphere in order to share the love vibration in as pure a manner as possible. Thus, this entity received permission to perform this mission. This entity was then a wanderer of no name, of Confederation origins, of [fourth] density, representing the [fourth]-density understanding of the vibration of understanding or love."
So, Mohammed and Jesus are presented very differently. Mohammed was a vehicle for what was told to him by the angel Gabriel. Jesus came from a higher density to help us directly.
I'm not the other poster. This should be evident if you examine the stark differences in writing styles and general tone.
Is it truly difficult to imagine more than one person on this site may find the Law of One worthy of study?
Yes, the Confederation is discussed as a positive union. At the same time, groups of negatively-oriented beings exist across space/time. Ra claims the leading negative group is from Orion.
It took me a few months, but I read all of The Ra Contact.
Started reading it because I was just curious. Growing up a strong Lutheran, I know the teachings of the Bible very well. I'd already dug into other areas, like the Rosicrucians, so this seemed like it wouldn't hurt.
After reading all of it, I can earnestly say there's something special about The Ra Contact. It connects the dots in just the right way. Looking at how different religions capture different aspects of existence…look, I have a very critical brain. This shouldn't click as well as it does, but man, it just does.
Here's what I mean:
A critical aspect of validating information is seeking multiple independent sources for corroboration.
Now, there's this book called "Genesis for a New Space Age." I attached a copy to this post. Here's an important review of it: https://www.bookdepository.com/Genesis-Space-Race-John-B-Leith/9780692449660
I've also read that book. Note that Genesis for a New Space Age is stated to have been released in 1980, just around or before The Ra Contact material was channeled. GNSA is an incredible read, so please go do so at some point (if not the whole thing, just read Chapter 14).
Among other similarities, both books make the following claims:
1) Atlantis was destroyed around 11,500 years ago.
2) A nuclear war between the Athenians caused the destruction of Atlantis (GNSA explicitly mentions the Athenian civilization as being at the bottom of what is today the Mediterranean Sea and discusses the "nuclear winter" causing the global flood. Ra doesn't mention the Athenians but says a "conflict" occurred).
3) Both mention the sinking of the continent of Mu/Lemuria. Ra says it sank 53,000 years ago, and GNSA sources Inner Earth people who say it happened within the last 250,000 years.
I think it's incredible they both make these claims. And there's more.
3) Ra says that descendants of Mu/Lemuria settled in Russia, North America, and South America, and that American Indians are descendants from Mu/Lemuria. Ra says they entered the Americas via a "bridge which no longer exists."
Check out this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mal%27ta%E2%80%93Buret%27_culture
4) Ra said Atlantis was destroyed about 11,500 years ago. Ra also says three Atlantean groups left before its destruction and settled in Tibet, Peru, and Turkey.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples_in_Peru: "Migrants…are thought to have reached Peru in the 10th millennium BCE"
Also, images of Native Tibetans and Peruvians have definite similarities. Interestingly, 23AndMe lumps South American and Asian genetic categories together.
From GNSA: "Remnants of the Atlanteans made their way to Egypt and…Africa…Atlanteans also headed for Brazil and America and became the forerunners of its Mayas and Incas and certain North American Indian tribes."
When two seemly-independent sources make the same claims…both using sources which aren't human…it's spooky, man.
Consider all the people in the world. Many are good, others are evil.
Is it not possible that aliens/spirits/any so-called "non-human beings" follow a similar pattern? Some may seek to help us, while others may only seek to help themselves.
You get at some interesting points. I'll share with you some perspectives which I recall from The Ra Contact. However, I'll first ask you to consider the primary message of Ecclesiastes. That message is: everything is meaningless, but having knowledge and wealth will make life sweeter.
I mention Ecclesiastes because even the Bible admits, to an extent, that nothing truly matters. Social norms? Meaningless. Helping others? Meaningless. Destruction? Meaningless. There is a proper time for everything. We should also remember, though, that Ecclesiastes also states some paths of life lead to better results. This is important to consider: you are responsible for assigning meaning to your life.
Assigning meaning is as simple as saying you wish to live a life of your own choosing. Killing and rape would violate this tenet, so we should avoid doing so as much as possible (though we admit that killing is permissible if authority is granted by government via the military or potentially as a demonstration of justice).
>If you believe there is no such thing as sin, then you have no ground to accuse people who rape and eat children.
Sin exists as that which is improper for the circumstances. I cannot fathom times when certain actions (rape, senseless killing) become generally permissible, so these are more pure sins.
>If you believe you can fix yourself, then you believe that the imperfect can make itself perfect - that a non God can make itself God.
We can only fix ourselves to the extent that we have catalyst to do so. God gives us catalyst in the form of hardships, and we should be thankful for those events.
>If you believe in salvation through someone other than Jesus, then you are rejecting the divine morality of the God of Israel.
Worshiping Jesus does not directly lead us to a God-pleasing life. We must instead choose to live as Jesus told us. To do so is to accept his divinity.
>If you reject the divine morality of the God of Israel, then you are rejecting love as the primary commandment - love of God and love of your neighbour - and you are rejecting the idea of sacrifice and service to others as the expression of love.
Indeed, "love your neighbor as yourself" is the greatest idea of all.
>Wouldn't they be invested heavily to make us believe there are no negative ET's?
I hold the view that both negative ETs exist and "The Ra Contact" is worth investigating.
>>It's a psyop. You are the crop being harvested. The cabal wants a new age of Ra worship, all the while giving consent to be harvested.
>Not this makes a lot more sense.
If you read "The Ra Contact", you'd see Ra is not to be worshiped.
>image saying "What does the Law of One's 'harvest' really mean?"
Questions like that are sketchy and not helpful, unless the purpose is to break consensus, in which case it's very effective. For example, later on, you say this:
>Law of one definitely seems like the grandest psyop ever now after looking at things differently.
I can play the game as well: "who's really running the psyop?" See how that muddles the point?
>if the law of one had all of the most important esoteric questions answered then why is there no effort by the controllers (illuminati or w/e you want to call them) to shut it down and stop people from reading it? Why is it encouraged by clowns like corey goode and david wilcock? Come on if this was the most secret knowledge that answers everything then why isn't everyone dead who put it out there?
I don't know. To be honest, "The Ra Contact" isn't something I had heard too much about until very recently. "The Law of One" books have been available for years and, prior to the Internet, were sidelined easily. "The Ra Contact" has only been around since 2016-2018 (forward is dated 2016, copyright of second edition is 2018).
>If we really are a crop being harvested, and going by Q's posts that definitely seems to be the case
Intriguing connection. Which posts are you referring to? For historical reasons (and this website WILL be studied by historians), can you at least include Q post numbers, if not a screenshot?
>Most likely all the "incarnation" stuff is bullshit
Here's an interesting article which says reincarnation has more weight than we may at face value accept: https://buddhismzone.org/what-religion-believes-in-reincarnation/
It's just one article, of course. However, it's hard to dismiss such a large and potentially foundational concept without evidence stronger than "most likely".
>free will is apparently really important to these beings, both good and evil beings
What is your view on free will? Would you say it exists? If not, do you have a concept to replace it with something which is more correct?
I can't speak for CE5 anon, since my first post in this thread series was, well, the first post with this ID in this thread (don't believe me? Ok.). That said, I do find it odd when people say there's no negative ETs, since so many reported ET experiences caused suffering.
>For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.
Agreed.
>Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.
Are commandments not considered the most general and broad of sins?
Pastors always told me that to "fear God" is to respect His absolute power.
>For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.
Agreed.
>He that trusteth in his riches shall fall: but the righteous shall flourish as a branch.
Trusting in riches is selfishness, and being righteous is sharing your light with others. So, agreed.
>For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
Agreed. The best use of wealth is the elimination of evils from the world.
>But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life.
Agreed. To live a life without sin is to serve God.
>For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
One of the most poetic verses from the Bible.
(I'll stop there :).)
The Bible is largely right, though the Old Testament has a tendency to be dictatorial at times. Jesus showed us how to live. By accepting God into our lives, we begin the process of breaking the bonds of sin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Podesta
>"Podesta wrote the forward for a [2010] book by Leslie Kean titled "UFOs- Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go On The Record". The book details numerous contact events by these trained personnel."
You think he may have wrote this forward to give credence to something which muddies the water?
Thanks, so you're referring to Q posts 632 and 749.
>Why do you thinkQ specifcally mentioned crops and harvests and that the end wont be for everyone?
I'm a data-driven fellow, so let's investigate Q's posts regarding the coming harvest.
According to qmap.pub, Q mentions the word "harvest" or "harvesting" in posts: 3985, 3960, 3915, 3897, 3708, 3599, 3525, 3006, and 2319.
We can safely filter out posts which mention "harvest" or "harvesting" specifically regarding ballot harvesting, C_A data collection, and Christine Blasey-Ford.
3708 and 3525 both mention Comey.
3599 is vague: "The Harvest [crop] has been prepared and soon will be delivered to the public for consumption."
3985 is similarly vague: a picture of a harvested field and link to this song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAfWVBvfMek
Also, Q mentions the word "crop" in posts: 3599, 3541, 881, and 749.
881 comes from an unrelated URL.
3541 links to a now-suspended Twitter account's Tweet. The qmap post title says "John Durham Progressing Quickly with Criminal Investigation into Obama Seniors at DOJ/FBI/CIA"
3599 is already covered.
749 is one which you have mentioned: "Coincidence the Matrix (movie) grew people as a crop, used for energy, and controlled their mind?"
We are then left with three posts which are relevant: 749, 3599, and 3985.
Q talks extensively about the deep corruption in government and his plans to excise the corruption. Q also talks about how mass media is controlled to manipulate the people (sheep).
Tangential but important to note for this analysis, Q addressed the question of alien life in 2222:
>"Q, are we alone? Roswell?"
>"No. Highest classification. Consider the vastness of space. Q"
Based on Q's observed patterns of behavior, it is logical to assume the harvest Q mentions refers to the vast number of treasonous officials who must (and will) be removed from their positions of power. It is also logical to assume Q, when discussing "The Matrix", refers to the wage-slave labor and media control systems which have been artificially constructed to sedate and control the population.
It is illogical to assume that the harvest Q mentions refers to a coming harvest of souls.
The term "hive mind" is typically used in the pejorative. Also, what discoveries count as "organic"? Which sites on the Internet are more "organic" than this one?
>Can you say gatekeeper?
Labeling me as a gatekeeper would imply I am deliberately obscuring or obstructing the debate, whereas I should hope that reasonably-minded readers conclude that I am attempting in earnest to be as clear and unbiased in manner as possible.
>The vast majority of bakers and posters on here don't want you second guessing the law of one or trying to figure out the Q matrix posts.
Since you decided to pull the "let me be clear", holier-than-thou card on readers, I'll use it as a counter.
To anyone reading this: please question and second-guess The Law of One. It is your duty to figure out its correctness or incorrectness, as so with anything or anyone claiming authority of matters.
Still here.
Here's some interesting evidence to examine:
https://youtu.be/5J4eFIwWdbU?t=773
Watch the lady's eyes.
>check 'em
I've analyzed this video with multiple people, and everyone comes to the same conclusion as you.
This video is remarkable for multiple reasons:
>The video has been available for two years.
>The video is filmed in HD (watching in 1080p gives me a very odd feeling).
>The lighting is even, consistent, and professional (near the end of the very long video, other cameras show the studio layout).
>Every other moment of the video, this "woman" is animated and engaged in the conversation. Right here, when this odd blink occurs, she becomes rigid and takes on a "thousand-mile stare."
>The blink feels natural. There's no discontinuities, no skipping, no visual artifacting. It feels like biology is actually at play.
I encourage you to share this clip with people. The sheer production quality will drop the guard of 95% of people. Apologies I can't get the GIF to be higher quality.
For the interested: http://cista.net/tomes/ is back online.
This bread is almost moldy. I have lots, LOTS of images and data which I'll be sharing once a new thread is baked.