>They keep grouping things I've said in with shills, which you may not understand that I'm not a shill
You pretty much lost me right there. You're at 23 posts and going back through much of what you posted you are heavily attempting to direct the discourse here. Your style never changed. You're you're authority here on everything. You seem to be projecting that others are doing exactly what you appear to be doing. Quite interesting.
>so they can solely approve of who else gets to bake
Wait a second didnt you say the same thing in the last thread? What's funny is that those anons have never baked here, or any of the research threads that Q posts in. What is even funnier is that they have been collecting evidence the entire time of the shills who have been copying them attempting to project it. You know, which is what you are doing right now.
So you're dominating the post counts here, directing the conversations, and trying to stop anons from looking deeper. Top kek is that everything you just projected can all be disproved over there. Also love how you tried to infiltrate and cause division, like you are doing now. You were trying to suck up and it failed. Then when you were caught in your lies and double talk you flipped and started screaming that they were the bakers union when in reality they are exposing them at every turn.
>I'll offer you choices to know
So anons dont have the choice on their own? Why do you have to be the one to offer choice?
>Should you show interest or demonstrate your ability to comprehend ground-level material
Always lording over the rest of the anons as "muh authority". As you have so many times before. Your style never changed.