well, you did you nonhumorous 55 post spurge.
whta else are you going to do today?
is it late night where you are? you are drunk?
who are you talking to?
what is it that they will get?
do you mean 'get it' to mean 'understand it' or do you mean it as a statement of punative result?
think critically
the Muslims were the ones erasing all history.
It was hardly the Catholics or the pope who were doing it.
'God'?
so the Roman legions were God?
well how flattering for the West, whose idea it was to have the men go and free the captive people's.
The Legions destroyed the temple because they were angry about the fact that the Jews were murdorers and did not fight honorably but just killed eveyrone who was not like them.
even when told to stand down by Titus, they destoryed the temple anyway, must to the chigrin of the leaders because such a place was such a lucrative franchise.
God wasn't there destroying it, it was the Legions of the Romans, and not under orders.
so you say that the legions were doing the work of God?
interesting narrative.
you prove that the Catholics are rightous, and the true keepers of the faith.
I've never seen that one before.
I'm here everyday too, anon. I make it my business to know who or what these things are.
If it were spurgeing porn, I'd filter. Otherwise I've go eyes open.
late at night and before the fireworks were over we had a duplicate bread.
it is numbered as 12595.
it was started in the afternoon on Friday as a duplicate, and then it got found and used at the end of the day, around the same time as the 12604 bread. It was filled up then, and it's still in the catalog with 751 posts.
I do not see it in notables.
this is the link to this bread that does not show up in notables (or I didn't find it), in case anyone wants to review it.
>>9841026
'deserve' implies intent. If you hit them then, you would be liable.
but you know that saying something so degenerate. You make waves for yourself, and that's the world you make and it exists for your erudition. But if you get paid as a shill then . . . you don't care.
what worries me in some sense, and yet I have no real way to know, is how the fake-banter is collected, and in what method the strings of it are woven to post, in a particular order, as if there is something really going on. Who is is that gets their statements clipped? how do the fakbots know how to construct the fakeness which they seep from their electric perches, as if an catalog of FUDish-ness and disdain for the WORD's of others.