something from 1974, or however old it is, is very nostolgic.
however, notables are for news.
something from 1974, or however old it is, is very nostolgic.
however, notables are for news.
it is what it is.
sometimes people become known, and that's what it is.
He's got his purpose, and he's rightous.
leave it at that.
https://www.visitmalta.com/en/world-war-2
if it's bloatables, that's just propaganda and
people will turn off to it.
like using too much unnecessary formatting, it's a kind of gate keeping.
whatever you want to imagine, anon, I'm for letting you have a voice.
If it's just repetitious stuff that people have seen a million times, that was run for bread after bread, week after week here, two years ago, I just point out:
traditionally notables were for current habbenings and news, and POTUS or DAN tweets.
so that's it. I said it. you are free to go on as you are. And I am free to understand that a lot of what gets slung back is what it is.
insertion troll shilling for effect, one post wonder.
not really an anon, but part of the smoochy team
they have to be in control of everything .
every real voice is harrassed and hassled.
they will never be nice, and they always assume the worst solution.
they will build you a gulug and send you there for daring to challange what they demand: full hedgemony to do their willful propaganda.