>>9805237

So how come posts with plenty of sauce about the matrix and q's posts linking to loosh never get included in the baker notables? When the shills can't complain about a post being sauceless, they pretend to ignore it. There is definitely something here the gatekeeper elements of these threads don't want you to find out. Oh yeah, this anon also has many coincidences with Q and this anon is why the L spammer exists. To annoy you to the point you don't discover TL.

https://8kun.top/truthlegion/res/8696.html#8696

This anon is precisely why the shills spam shit like L, so you don't discover all of these coincidences. They drive the repetition home so you miss the nuances and the cryptic messages from white hats given to anons literally since this all started. Q has said many many times there are no coincidences, and this anon has a ton. Also, much of what this anon discusses is heavily revolved around the info that this thread touches on, also they claim to have been having UFO sightings for a long time which is probably why Q knows about them and also being in a military unit you never heard of. Well, I've been following this group for a long time and I cannot deny there are so many coincidences between their posts and Q's it is unmistakable and undeniable. Hence why it's so important for you to miss it.

>>9802321

>"Fear monger" labels won't work forever.

Funny how the fear monger projection just happens to follow into these threads huh? There is a reason Q's posts about the matrix are quickly attacked and efforts to force you to ignore it. Now why do you think the shills don't want you discovering loosh or the matrix connection to Q posts? Why do they want everyone to believe all aliens are good?

>>9639971, >>9640001, >>9723528, >>9786949, >>9788846, >>9790048, >>9790538, >>9791845, >>9792369, >>9793777, >>9797624, >>9797726

Notables called out from pb? Now why do you see bakers immediately interjecting their authority and dictating what is considered notable and what isn't? Why are they screaming that posts don't contain sauce, when they clearly do? Why so much effort to stop anons from seeing this? Why so much effort to censor posts which contain sauce?

>>9802939, >>9803940, >>9804430

This is where the baker shill was outed. Putting up fox news segments of Elizondo who is part of the "to the stars academy" which is heavily tied to john podesta. Now why would the bakers be linking us to fox news and someone directly tied to podesta?

Sometimes it's more important to see what they are hiding from you vs what they are trying to make you focus on. If you think there isn't a massive coordinated effort to direct the flow of conversation here guess again. This is the most controlled thread on Q research.

>>9957713

Hello Steven.

>>9964755

Greer is innocent because he always tells the truth. Nice save!

>>9971970

>>9972099

Ba ba ba BAKER NOTABLE!!!!

Coincidences between posts from this thread and Q's specific wording! As many have said Q posts have multiple meanings and nothing is an accident. Not even the error. Errors are roadmaps!

>>9977376

BOOM!!!!!

>>9979986

>L

>L

>>9982360

It may not be what you want or expect right now, and it may never be how the breads were before, but right now I think the shilling still holds some importance to show anons just how hard they are trying to derail all of the real digs. You may find a few missing pieces going back in the breads, there's a lot of cryptic comms being dropped in here. The most shilling has been done to prevent you from seeing those, so that means something.

>>10025779

Soon they will realize all of these shills were meant to stop anons from finding your coincidences.

>>10056391

>The best proof is the immediate spam after your posts. It keeps happening every time you post. It is wonderful to see so much effort. They certainly don't want anons to discover any of the coincidences. L is a clown, anons know the difference.

LoL triggered the L shill just by mentioning the coincidences also funny how the clown repeats some of the same phrases like lights on.

Obvious subversion from the truth!! Spam the board so no one can see or figure out the cryptic comms

>>10063790

>4:45 "Venus supposedly is untouchable" - Venus is a Pleiadian colony, home planet of Ashtar Sheran, therefore SSP and dark fleet attacks would be suicide.

Can you provide some rock solid proof of this? Facts are important.

Just wanted to make sure you weren't regurgitating something you read online and actually know what you're talking about.

>>10063790

>>10063800

>>10064086

>home planet

https://www.space.com/18526-venus-temperature.html

"The atmosphere of Venus is made up almost completely of carbon dioxide, with traces of nitrogen."

So pleiadians breathe carbon dioxide huh? Nice evolutionary trait. I'd be willing to throw that around if they were a fucking tree.

"The average temperature on Venus is 864 degrees Fahrenheit (462 degrees Celsius). Temperature changes slightly traveling through the atmosphere, growing cooler farther away from the surface. Lead would melt on the surface of the planet, where the temperature is around 872 F (467 C)."

The average temperature of Venus is 864F. So this is their home planet and a humanoid lifeform just happened to evolve on a planet that is regularly over 850 degrees? Lead melts but they walk around just fine? Breathing CO2?

Try again clowns. Ashtar Sheeran is a psyop, the 1977 TV broadcast is most likely a true data point but it's been highly skewed to suit the new age agendas. You know, the bullshit love and light crowd that says aliens are going to solve all our problems so you don't have to do anything.

There is no parental figure up there, they just don't want us destroying all their resources and crops (humans) with nuclear weapons. The only intervention is nukes, nothing more. No evidence to suggest otherwise, no facts.

Make facts matter again.

>>10092544

Quick grierfag, drop a shit-tier soft disclosure sighting video and engage in a scripted censorship battle over L to distract the anons from learning about the autists Q has been interacting with project looking glass for years. You know the true geniuses. Definitely don't want the anons to learn about the hidden comms in Q posts relating to the highest level connections. Also don't let anyone talk about loosh or Q post #749. Fuck their learning our tricks!! Quick let's do another L slide and pretend to argue about it. That'll distract em.

>>10114759

>When someone finds out something he/she presents information, not his desire to be special.

Several personal night vision recordings of UFO sightings (which shills here cannot provide, only second hand videos), detailed descriptions on how to help engage, along with tons of the deepest level physics and metaphysics information. Not to mention tying together complexity and chaos theory with a time model. Oh how about when white hats dropped the torus mobius strip coincidence to him around the same time as a Q post which also happened to be how the time machine worked in avengers end game? How about right here a dig regarding "through the looking glass" which relates to the mobius strip and it just happens to align with Q posts. There's a lot more. Coincidence after coincidence and you desperately try to frame it like there's nothing there so anons don't look into it. Kind of similar to how the baker shills deliberately go out of their way to not include any of these anons posts in the notables after numerous anons call them out as notable. There's thousands of posts over there at TL regarding everything anons discuss here but much of it taken to the next level.

Why don't you actually read all of it before trying to consensus crack? You may find a whole lot more.

>>10114634

>Can you prove this with a short summary or a graphic?

Absolutely already been proven, but you couldn't fit it in a short summary or a single graphic. Way too much. Coincidence after coincidence is proof positive. How many times did Q say in the early days no coincidences? Here's a good place for anons to start, even though it doesn't have all of them in it. Too many specific things back to back and way too direct to pass off as coincidence.

https://8kun.top/truthlegion/res/8696.html#8696

Plenty more in this one, and all the threads before it.

https://8kun.top/truthlegion/res/12109.html#q12109

Anons can read on their own and make up their own minds

Judging by your posting history on this thread and tone of ridicule one could come to the conclusion you may have an agenda to keep anons from reading and learning about this. You also may have an agenda to play the angle of trying to pass it off as nothing so people disregard and don't read it. I suspect you will continue with that, and ignoring all the evidence in front of you. As you have clearly done up until this point.

Also hilarious to watch L copying much of what this anon has posted here and at TL. Every copycat shill from here has been another direct attempt to steer anons away from the cryptic posts. Much like you are doing now.

I've read every post since the beginning of these threads, including the posts I believe have come from you. Certain anons are easy to follow based on narrative and agenda.

Now drop another soft disclosure distraction video to try to blend in or to stop anons from discussing this, or continue to play it off like it's all a coincidence and not worth investigating.

Anons are waking up and you and your handlers don't like it.

>>10136567

It's grierfag on another computer. He's done this for years. I'm sure you've read the previous breads that's why you noticed the similarities. Trying to make himself out to be the be-all end-all source of knowledge for ce5. If he was posting all with one computer like he did previously he'd be at 100+ posts as in previous threads, so now he only posts his ce5 contact reports and gatekeeping with one IP and the IP he's using now is for consensus cracking and bolstering his gatekeeper IP.

He lost long ago. Anons aren't stupid.

>>10160161

Nice back-peddle.

>>10177640

I like how you believe everything you read online.

>Reads what anon says online and compares it to stuff he reads online so it all must be true.

You are getting terribly sloppy at your distraction job here. Well I guess you always have been.

Can anyone prove the 4D 5D bullshit? Like actual facts and proof and sauce? Or is it just text that a human put online or in a book without verifiable qualitative evidence which can be corroborated?

>The ones awakened will start a new world in an 5th dimension earth.

Proof? Or is this just another distraction narrative from a litany of questionable new posters that you always respond to and over-assert your confirmation bias in order to persuade others to believe and/or distract them with?

>>10160136

>See how hard they try reverse psychology to stop anons from reading the world breaking info at TL? - One more sentence.

When you've researched these threads as much as I have you can only come to one conclusion. "They" all exist here to prevent you from finding a certain place. Once anons see why they spent so much effort the light bulbs are going to start to explode.

>>10143455

>"grierfag"

Do you always reply to yourself in the third person? Mentally that seems unhealthy.

>>10250905

White hats drop crumbs here. It's your job to pick them out of the spam and feces like L and grierfag. Anons who are looking for them can find them. Coincidences do not lie.

>>10263132

Everyone here should ask themselves a question. Why is there so much effort to get anons to believe the incarnated alien narratives?

To me it's just another attempt at displaying authority so anons believe them. Look at me, I'm an incarnated Pleiadian light-being that was sent here to guide you.

• Normies who are beginning to wake up are very subject to interference, so with this stance of authority the disinfo agents are far more likely to sell their narratives.

>>10272371

Why is a baker interjecting his opinions, and why do you have 49 posts, much of which are spam and consensus cracking?

I thought bakers were supposed to be unbiased, and just collect notables as anons call them out? In all previous threads you controlled anons were calling out notables, sometimes numerous times, all of which you ignored.

You ignore notables but only put in the breads what you feel suits your agenda.

Oh wait, you're the same shill at TL getting your ass handed to you. Driving the narratives much here?

Anons can see your failures over here and read backwards.

>>>/truthlegion/14971

It's glorious to see you making so many mistakes throughout all of this. Now make some more posts, scream that everyone is a shill who doesn't agree with your narratives, continue to dominate the bread and continue to pretend every fucking time that you're handing off the dough without ever doing so.

>>10273265

>Baker here. I have to step away from this bread for some time due to a certain personal arrangement

You'll be back next thread, just like you always are. You always say you'll be leaving at the end of the thread for optics to make it look like you haven't controlled these threads since around the third one.

>>10283796

>But we all have eternity to learn.

What makes you say that?

And do you have any sauce to prove the existence of sheeran or are you just going to use the 1977 television interruption as the only data point?

What I want to know is why do so many on here come here posting they know for sure about incarnation and reincarnation without having a single shred of real evidence to back it up?

>>10277664

So many coincidences with Q's posts.

>>9971970

>>9972099

>>10025779

>>10047775

>>10119775

>>10173330

>>10203800

>>10277664

>>10333497

anons should probably back these posts up offline before the pics RIP. Now that they understand the significance of what they are dealing with in these threads. shills will scream about this and flood the thread now so you miss it all again.