Truth Seeker ID: aa42c5 Aug. 6, 2020, 9:42 a.m. No.4329   🗄️.is 🔗kun

California spent millions on arena hospital that saw only 9 patients

 

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Doctors arrived at an arena-turned-medical center in Sacramento in mid-April and were told to prepare for 30 to 60 coronavirus patients to arrive within days. They spent the weekend working feverishly to get ready.

 

State officials envisioned the cavernous Sleep Train Arena and an adjoining facility as a place where hundreds of patients could be treated, but in the first week just one arrived. The pace never increased, and the 250 assembled medical workers — physicians, nurses, pharmacists and administrative staff — found themselves wondering what to do.

 

“People began to question within themselves whether they were really needed or not," said Dr. Charles Moore, a retired internal medicine physician who worked there for about six weeks. “There were no plans for what would happen if you gave a party and no one came."

 

Ultimately, just nine patients arrived over 10 weeks. The cost to care for them was a staggering $12 million.

 

The Sacramento site was one of 15 temporary medical facilities set up around California in anticipation of a surge of cases that never materialized. It shut down on July 1, as did most others.

 

But as virus cases started rising again around California in June, the state decided to keep some open and take lessons from Sleep Train to run them more efficiently.

 

Kim Brown Sims, the arena's chief nursing office, wrote a training manual the state could use across its facilities. She also recommended the state either create its own electronic record system to use at every site or partner with local hospitals to use their systems, rather than requiring facilities to create their own paper systems, something the doctors had been asked to do that first weekend at Sleep Train.

 

Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security focused on pandemic preparedness, said California wasn't alone in preparing for a New York City-like flood of cases that would overwhelm hospitals.

 

“Many places just went very fast because they were scared and they had the ability to do it so they did it, not really thinking about how they were going to make all the pieces fit together and integrate with the existing health care system and deliver efficient care," he said.

 

Moving forward, he said when deciding whether to open alternate care sites California officials should use regional infection rates and hospitalizations to set staffing so the sites don't have too many doctors and not enough patients.

 

Brian Ferguson, a spokesman for the state Office of Emergency Services, acknowledged the state didn't use local data when fist setting up field sites.

 

“I think in hindsight we would certainly make sure that we would do some things similar again, but perhaps be more thoughtful about how fast we ramp up or have more off ramps," he said.

 

However, Ferguson said the state benefits from having staff who have been trained to work at such facilities and established procedures for running the sites.

 

“Having those folks trained, having these sites available will continue to be a value," he said.

 

Sleep Train Arena was the site of an April 6 news conference by Gov. Gavin Newsom, who hailed the facility as a prime example of California's rapid preparedness. It and a nearby building, both owned by the NBA's Sacramento Kings, would house 400 beds and take people discharged from hospitals or be the first stop for people with mild to moderate virus symptoms, he said.

 

Newsom didn't mention the state was paying the Kings to rent and provide services, a cost of $1 million over two months. The state spent another $7 million on mechanical, electrical, plumbing and other improvements, according to the Department of General Services.

 

The state also spent at least $2.8 million on staff, nearly $500,000 on personal protective equipment and about $1 million on other expenses.

 

More

 

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/state-spent-millions-arena-hospital-051926789.html

Truth Seeker ID: aa42c5 Aug. 8, 2020, 6:20 p.m. No.4423   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Kansas health secretary used misleading charts to push mask mandate

 

The secretary for the Kansas Department of Health and Education is facing criticism for using a misleading chart while advocating for a statewide mask mandate. Secretary Lee Norman gave a speech earlier this week detailing the difference in coronavirus cases between Kansas counties with a mask mandate and counties without one. According to a report from the Sentinel, Norman used an axis with a range of 15 to 25 to describe the number of new cases in masked counties and used a range of 4 to 14 to describe the number of new cases in counties without a mask mandate, making it appear as though counties without a mask mandate had more cases. When the two sets of data are placed on a chart with the same axis, counties without a mask mandate have fewer new cases per day than counties with a mask mandate. Norman told reporters that counties with a mask mandate were "winning the battle" against the coronavirus. "All of the improvement in the case development comes from those counties wearing masks," he said.

 

Michael Austin, the director of the Center for Entrepreneurial Government, accused Norman of knowingly misleading the public. The center is part of the Kansas Policy Institute, which owns the Sentinel. "At a time when the public needs government to provide sound conclusions with accurate information, it’s unfortunate the Kansas Health Secretary knowingly deceived the public into justifying his narrative," Austin said. Kansas House Majority Leader Dan Hawkins, a Republican, similarly criticized Norman. Norman was appointed to his position by Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.

 

"Gov. Kelly and her administration have failed Kansans time and again, but manipulating data to intentionally deceive the entire state is a new low," Hawkins said. "Tens of thousands of Kansans have lost their jobs and businesses as a direct result of Gov. Kelly’s politics-first response to the COVID pandemic, and these individuals struggling to make ends meet deserve to know the truth. It is reprehensible for a public servant like Dr. Norman that we trusted to protect our health and safety in a nonpartisan way to intentionally spread misinformation. The Kelly administration has lost all credibility," he added. The Washington Examiner has reached out to the Kansas Department of Health and Education for comment. Fifteen counties in Kansas followed Kelly's request for a mask mandate, and the remaining 90 counties in the state did not.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/kansas-health-secretary-used-misleading-charts-to-push-mask-mandate

 

KDHE doctored a COVID case chart to justify mask mandates

 

https://sentinelksmo.org/kdhe-doctored-a-covid-case-chart-to-justify-mask-mandates/