>https://pastebin.com/GJcnWFjR
> This is incidental to general conclusion regarding DACA quoted above
insert 'the' → the general conclusion
Is this phrase part of what the SCOTUS decided:
>And under prosecutorial discretion, a president can stop legally stop enforcing any law he wants, completely.
While reading along it is not clear to me if this is the conclusion of SCOTUS, of Yoo, or of JC
→ That is the new precedent that was set.
OK that IS the central point. It must really stand out, and not look like an afterthought at the end of a short paragraph.
This point appears to be key:
→ In a roundabout way, Section 706 has just been rewritten. Presidents can sign executive actions that contradict laws established by Congress and go against the Constitution, and the APA will no longer be bound to “hold unlawful and set aside” these actions: to the contrary, they have been prohibited from doing so.
Very interesting. I learned a lot.
So the baffling SCOTUS decision appears to do the opposite of how it has been characterized in the press, giving the Executive a tremendous hammer to disregard any law passed by congress. Wow.
POTUS has continued to claim the decision gives him much greater power than presidents have had before. You explained why that is so!
Now I'll look at the 2nd link.
Thank you JC. Those who analyze and write and explain are a treasure.
<3