Truth Seeker ID: dc75c7 June 19, 2020, 1:24 p.m. No.1303   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1304

A short article with sauce?

The meme says it all but lacks sauce.

 

Aha. Now we got sauce:

Chinese Company Fails to Perform on CA Mask Contract; Newsom Overpays Anyway

https://www.redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2020/06/15/chinese-fails-to-perform-on-ca-mask-newsom-overpays-anyway/

Truth Seeker ID: dc75c7 June 19, 2020, 4:18 p.m. No.1305   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2969

>>1288

Related, from >>>/qresearch/9675096

 

Landmark study suggests that if "Defunded", Police will steal (civil asset forfeiture) from the public to generate revenue

 

excerpt: "Results are clear: Forfeiture has no meaningful effect on crime fighting, but forfeiture activity does increase when local economies suffer. These results add to a growing body of research suggesting police pursue forfeiture less to fight crime than to raise revenue. Given this evidence and serious civil liberties concerns raised by forfeiture, forfeiture proponents should bear the burden of proof when opposing reforms that would keep police focused on fighting crime, not raising revenue."

 

https://ij.org/report/fighting-crime-or-raising-revenue

 

So, let's summarize what the [D]s want to do:

1) Steal from Police Budget ("Defund police") which will only provide the Police a greater incentive to legally steal from the Public (asset forfeiture).

2) Let violent criminals out of prison

3) Use Police to collect "fines" for the cities

4) Use Police to continue pursuing nonviolent FAKE crimes (eg drug use) to tap federal funding

5) Use Police to take guns from law abiding gun owners.

6) Not allow Police to do what they were intended to do, such as proactively protecting the public from REAL criminals (eg violence and theft) as well as solving REAL crime.

 

All of these actions combined will only further victimize the poor and increase HATE for the POLICE. And the cycle continues…