Suggestion:
The journalists that answer all of the questions in this post, in a normie freindly way, will win the prize.
But they should answer it for both Q and anons..
Why are we here? Media is still too chicken shit to do a real write up.
..And I mean this in the context of: there's actually two questions here:
1) anons ask "Why does the media not ask us why we are here?" (proceeds to spell it out in one paragraph)
2) Q then asks "At what point does it become mathematically impossible?" as part of a corroborating response.
Soo.. How exactly could it be mathematically impossible for the Fake Media to 'not get what anons are all about, after almost 4 years of anons literally singing it from the mountaintops… with Q like a damn symphony of anons??
and I really like the site menu bar at the top going transparent.. is there a way to do that in the user.js?
You get it. The end article would essentially need to reverse-engineer the timeline of MSM's own failure for the reader to peruse.
Because answering it for both anon's question AND Q's question, would require that background timeline, to be understood.
So the reader would end up seeing exactly how the media is broken.
Godspeed, if you like the suggestion, feel free to use it as you see fit o7
>So the reader would end up seeing exactly how the media is broken.
..by proxy of the timeline of anons "taking over the idea of information", as General Flynn states.
sorry for the rambling manner of getting muh idea out, kek :)