586 ： Jim ◆6P7QkQf8Ys ＠Apparently admin ★ ： 2006/08/18 (木) 05:07:04 ID: ???

>>575 Lets try as usual as it was before. If there is reason to change
the old ISP regulation from 2ch then we can discuss it here.
For the time being I don't see a reason to change the current
system.
Lets talk about it again next week.

587 ： 名無し編集部員 [sage] ： 2006/08/18 (木) 05:20:34 ID: wVkRJxvX

>>586
2chとBBSPINKは"別の"BBSなので、2chのボランティアがBBSPINKの名前でISPに報告する事が出来ませんので、"現在のシステム"は稼動していません。
2 彼らにBBSPINKでも2chと同様の活動(ISPへの報告/規制の解除)を許可して下さい。

Since 2ch and BBSPINK are "another" BBS and the volunteer of 2ch cannot report to ISP in the name of BBSPINK, "current system" is not working.
Please permit them the same activity (report to ISP /Release of regulation) as 2ch also by BBSPINK.

588 ： Jim ◆6P7QkQf8Ys ： 2006/08/18 (木) 05:25:37 ID: qIbyRziA

Maybe I am not understanding this reporting system. Can someone please explain it to me?

589 ： 名無し編集部員 [sage] ： 2006/08/18 (木) 05:37:43 ID: wVkRJxvX

>>588
When those who engaged in disruptive behavior obstinately at BBS are

1. Volunteers report to ISP.
2. ISP copes with warning etc. to a user.
3. Receive mail of the completion of correspondence from ISP.
4. Work deregulation.

There is also a place which does not correspond depending on ISP if it is not the report from the management persons concerned.


BBSにて執拗に迷惑行為をされた方が居た場合

1.ボランティアの方が、ISPに報告
2.ISPがユーザーに対して警告等の対処を行う
3.ISPから対処完了のメールを受け取る
4.規制解除の作業を行う

ISPによっては、運営関係者からの報告でなければ対応しないところもあります。