we have this kind of posting, like, ------------------------- I love the woman who is working in Seven Eleven at XXXavenue and *** street. Her name is Ms.OOOOO She looks so saxy, and must be wearing black pretty panty. I wanna fuck with her so badly. ------------------------- Should we delete this kind of posting or not? and I want to know the reason if it should be deleted or not
roughly speaking, you can interpret the meaning of them as celebrities and professionals ( famous ones ) strictly speaking, we need to make more datailed wording
we estimate that Group-1 people shall be ones who are working in public media and accordingly cross the lips of whole nation or lots of people, like politicians, TV performers.
and shall be ones who are expected to be talken by lots of people, like criminals ,culprits who are reported in media.
their right of privacy is limited because of their responsibilities for society.
I can not say that hostess girls have no responsibilities for society. but that is not as much as heavy as Group-1 people.
If the postings asking hostess-girls' potential customers to become their real customers in bbspink, is it ok to post something like recruiting sex-girls' customers in bbspink?
there are lots of paid advertisements of sex-service-shops in bbspink. but those postings are available for free.
do you really think it's ok to have those plenty of free advertisements postings in bbspink? if those girls fake themselves as hostess girls, even if they are not hostess girls adtually, it might be able to become a dangerous place for prostitution.
'' United States President enjoyed his day shopping in a department store with his wife and 2 kids'' '' Ms XXX, who is working as a hostess girl, was walking around in XXX park with her hus and kids''
do you think it's ok to treat those 2 postings on the same level?
Jim says that hostess girls are belonging to Group-1, but that's goning to mean that President in the US and hostess girls are on the same level.