I have read it. Please follow the advice of >>77
- 78 ： Jim ◆6P7QkQf8Ys ： 2007/07/12 (水) 01:11:20 ID: 1ec3z3AG
- >>76
I have read it. Please follow the advice of >>77 - 85 ： Jim ◆6P7QkQf8Ys ： 2007/07/12 (水) 08:01:48 ID: 1ec3z3AG
- >>80-84
I understand this problem, and obviously we do borrow the blocking and very
thankfully. Yes of course ISPs are very kind to their current users, even if those
users are vandals, that is the ISPs economic issue. So blocking entire ISP is
already proven more effective, because this forces the isp to respond since we hope more than one user
with that ISP is a frequent user of the site. However that is a very draconian response and
we all know that, even though the blocking team works tirelessly.
The idea of making a new system is probably a pipe dream, but I think that the idea
of bbspink coming up with a way to augment or improve the system
could be a reality. It is beyond my own personal abilities. I could do things in a
very draconian way as well, but the pinpoint precision blocking of a target like a
surgical strike with a laser guided bomb from a jet would be a fantastic tool if some
smart person could make it. That is probably what 79 was trying to figure out and caused
this trouble. The idea should not be forgotten, but we do not have the ability yet to implement
this idea.