dChan


137 : ◆MUMUMUhnYI [sage] : 2007/12/29 (金) 02:42:27 ID: fDycolaX
PINKちゃんねる規制について考えてみるスレ 3
http://pie.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1198650656/786

Jim-san,
I wrote a comment to 79. Roughly translation version is as follows.
Please point it out when my remark is not appropriate.

--
79,

All of Jim-san's approval should be opened clearly at bbspink itself.
It should be fully-disclosed for all project members and bbspink users.
79, you don't understand bbspink is fully-opened BBS for discussion.
If you do not so, all members cannot do it be trusted.

You wrote "The project is private consented from Jim-san.".
What is "private consented"? Statement itself? Project's outline?
or some other matters?
I cannot understand it.

And I wrote "Please rename the file name including 'alpha' for displaying
alpha-version." Can't you read it?
Version control and some other my sugestions are only technical matters.
You do not ignore a part of the essence intentionally. OK?

Such a kind of rename from "policy" to "_policy" is meaningless
because the link URL does not tell the description of it.

And at last, you please stop doing completely different things after
saying "Hai, wakarimashita".

Before you say "Hai, wakarimashita", you must describe your understanding
about the matter, and you don't do anything after approval that your
understanding is correct.