743 ： 名無し編集部員 ： 2013/08/30 (木) 15:00:00 ID: j1bo1icU

>>735
Why don't you answer the second question?

As many people are afraid, you mean the period of stored maru data is limitless, don't you?

757 ： 名無し編集部員 ： 2013/08/30 (木) 15:00:00 ID: j1bo1icU

>>749
I know there is no Maru data now, but I suspect that there is possibility that
the leaked data contain maru data before June (or July) 2013 which goes back to
some years ago.

In other wods, if the maru data is to be expired and deleted in a certain period less than 2 mounths,
as the system specification, we can be convinced that no more maru data will be discolosed.

But if the expiration period is more than 2 months or limitless,
there is still the risk that more maru data will be disclosed and therefore
more association between users' identity and their posts on the 2 channel.

764 ： 名無し編集部員 ： 2013/08/30 (木) 15:00:00 ID: j1bo1icU

>>760
I'm not talking about new system.
I would like to know whether the expiring period of stored maru data was
less than 2 months or longer in old system.

We are afraid that the cracker has maru data before June 2013,
such as the data of 2012, 2011 and so on, while he/she has not released it, yet.

766 ： 名無し編集部員 ： 2013/08/30 (木) 15:00:00 ID: j1bo1icU

>>760
I traslate >>763.

1. Is the leaked maru data limited to that of two months (= July 14 to August 10) ?
2. I think at least, time records of each post during the period of leaked data (= July 14 to August 10)
should be deleted.

I think if the second is done and the 2ch managers ask log-publishing sites such as logsok
to reflesh the log data, the privacy of many people can be protected.

Would you please ask 2ch managers to do so, Mr. Jim?