dChan


539 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 15:14:38 ID: 9ARP59am
>>528
You mean >>22 ? I read it.
But this logic needs the agreement of the member.
At least, TOA(+) members feel to need more time.

>>531
I want Mr.Jim to know that TOA(+) needs more time.
546 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 15:20:06 ID: 9ARP59am
>>532
Yes,I have.
But I think below issues.

1)We depend on News paper, TV,etc...
We quote many sentences.
So Should we accept the quortation of external sites.

2)Non-affiliation blog
Some blog have no advertises.
If we ban all of quortations , they can't use 2ちゃんねる。.
It causes decrease of visitors to 2ちゃんねる。.
553 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 15:27:06 ID: 9ARP59am
>>542
Oh,sorry.
These facts has happened.

Naturally, 東亜民 don't feel to ban quortations.
And They disagree to vote because they had no disucussion and opinions.
嫌儲民(poverty's member) made thread to vote without notice.
東亜民(TOA's member) got angry and filled it.
嫌儲民 made new thread to vote and start voting 23:00(Japan standard time) without notice.
And 嫌儲民 used multiple posting tool and filled voting "YES".
555 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 15:27:51 ID: 9ARP59am
>>548
Please tell me this sentence.
582 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 15:37:13 ID: 9ARP59am
>>564
YES! Decide without disucussio makes no value.
So TOA(+)'s decision is wrong because we don't discuss.
By the way,著作権法32条 is proper to matome-site ?
587 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 15:39:43 ID: 9ARP59am
>>579
This decision has a problem. so we keep pesent style.
589 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 15:41:32 ID: 9ARP59am
>>540
Here is not Army.
And if here is Army, they are friend.
Will you kill them?
600 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 15:48:27 ID: 9ARP59am
>>593
I have some questions.

1) Where do 2channel servers place ? Japan?
2) Please show me your examples.
3) Increasing people is the most important problem,isnt this?
If so, we should get people coming from Matome-site .
603 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 15:49:51 ID: 9ARP59am
>>598
I read it.
I showed it before and I wrote problem for it.
612 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 15:54:56 ID: 9ARP59am
>>608
You use wrong assumption, because vote is based on discussions.
621 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 15:56:43 ID: 9ARP59am
>>615
You have the burden of proof.
Please answer the question.
632 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 16:02:15 ID: 9ARP59am
>>626
Yes, of course lol.
At first,We must open the fog of buttle field.
The resalt of vote doesn't proof the right way.
Therefore, he won't able to make right decisions.
636 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 16:04:07 ID: 9ARP59am
>>629
? I like to walk.
645 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 16:09:29 ID: 9ARP59am
>>637
Yes.
Many threads has changed for a few hours without enough discussion.
And he didn't know the background of decision.
647 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 16:11:14 ID: 9ARP59am
>>646
This vote went without enough notice.
653 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 16:14:52 ID: 9ARP59am
>>651
Good night.
660 : 名無し編集部員 [sage] : 2014/03/04 (月) 16:18:47 ID: 9ARP59am
>>654
I think once he make decisions, it will be diffucult to change them.
so, I think I tell you as many as I can before he make decisions.