Anonymous ID: c17f53 Dec. 16, 2017, 6:06 a.m. No.107422   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7423 >>7428

>>107401

>>107401

>Q himself goes out of his way to call it fake.

>Values anons opinion over Q

You genuinely should be ashamed of yourself.

This is a pure cause and you and your "anons" wish to dilute it with ego.

I can't even believe you continue to use the word anons in that sentence when you're clearly making a conscious effort to famefag.

If you sleep well at night with no shame, I will be ashamed for you.

Anonymous ID: c17f53 Dec. 16, 2017, 6:13 a.m. No.107433   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7437

>>107409

If Q doesn't post the proof using his trip in this board, how can you even be sure.

But regardless, why are you seeking attention?

 

If you can explain your motivation, right here, directly to the community, how can you expect support by mindlessly directing us to stroke your ego?

Anonymous ID: c17f53 Dec. 16, 2017, 6:16 a.m. No.107440   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7443

>>107430

In all honesty, I don't mind anti-school.

I've watched a few of his videos, and although he annoys me, he's not doing anything wrong and seems to have the right intention to the cause.

 

The problem is when anons here want to discuss meta aspects of the board simply for attention, i.e. serves no Q specific purpose but to promote what they think is "unique behind the scenes baker insight". Waow.

Anonymous ID: c17f53 Dec. 16, 2017, 6:22 a.m. No.107461   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>107448

The worst part is their ignorance stemming from misplaced righteousness.

They have no regard for what their "interview" might do for the board.

Some youtube normie might be interested in joining us but then is offput by their "personalities".

I see 0 community benefit in their actions, and worse, they can't even muster up some testosterone to answer to their community.

Anonymous ID: c17f53 Dec. 16, 2017, 6:27 a.m. No.107477   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7539 >>7545

>>107465

Normies can find the board themselves via the youtube personalities they like.

Any input from yourself thinking it will increase that chance is megalomania.

Such a shame when I had respect for you when you were a hard working baker.

Anonymous ID: c17f53 Dec. 16, 2017, 6:32 a.m. No.107498   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>107490

Gross double posting.

Shameful attention seeking.

Wanting to double post to draw attention away from all the negative backlash you're getting from us.

Anonymous ID: c17f53 Dec. 16, 2017, 6:45 a.m. No.107548   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7566

>>107539

You will not get answers from them, they are lost because they think they are the reason for the redpills they think they've gained and not the youtubers themselves. It's sad.

Anonymous ID: c17f53 Dec. 16, 2017, 6:48 a.m. No.107560   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7575

>>107545

You're completely right.

But the way you're doing it by involving yourself and discussing meta aspects is the wrong approach.

The mere fact that you weaseled yourself in an interview within an hour of shit hitting the fan just shows how much (little) you thought this through.

Let the youtubers do what youtubers do.

Don't discuss board related shit when you don't even know the consequences.

How retardedly righteous can you be ?

Anonymous ID: c17f53 Dec. 16, 2017, 7:38 a.m. No.107721   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7724

>>107704

Elaborate how that makes sense because it appears you're above me.

Awaiting your justification for Q saying "fake".

Little anti-school fag creates gmail account, emails himself, makes vid, gets views.

You embarass yourself, go to /thestorm/