It's just someone who has been following the Q drops like us, doing as instructed and creating a twatter acct. to start sharing info and redpilling the people with memes, etc. Acct goes back to Dec 8th. (Pics)
Um. Yeeeeeah. Whatever happens…
If this lot says it's aliens…
It's definitely NOT aliens.
It might be one of the medals she found described in this magazine interview: (Pic)
"My parents were high-ranking military officers during World War II."
Of her mother: "She was on a Red Cross vehicle on the streets in the middle of gunfire and picked up the wounded. At the time, she was confronted with taking care of 45 wounded partisans. The hospital at the end of the Belgrade was on a hill and she had to go through a city to bring these wounded people to safety and get help with 6 nurses. In the middle of this whole thing, the driver was killed."
http:// anthemmagazine.com/qa-with-marina-abramovic/
Someone replied to her on Voat (pizzagate) with their own Roeper School Tom Hanks story - Sarah linked it on Twatter: (Pic)
https:// voat.co/v/pizzagate/2274465/11290897?context=10
(I can only assume Sarah Ruth Ashcroft is a pseudonym as its initials are SRA - i.e.:Satanic Ritual Abuse..?)
Ok guise - so I was attempting to redpill my friend the other day (this person is pretty clued up in politics and media in a general/liberal sense) and their response to the Q drops was to suggest I look into "Cambridge Analytica" and how data was used from personality tests and online profiles to predict and target potential Trump supporters with certain messages. The friend said the industry people (in fields like advertising/politics) were stunned because it was sort of genius and had never been done that way before in politics.
This friend suggested that people who were more likely to believe conspiracy theories were targeted by Trump's team - with targeted ads which apparently disappeared after the election and were hard to find again… (I have not checked this for accuracy).
The intimation on this friend's part, was that perhaps these boards (4&8ch) had been chosen for these Q drops, not because of awesome autist research and meme factor, but rather for "open-mindedness".. to put it politely.
The friend still ultimately conceded that the drops sounded interesting (from what they read of them) and also agreed the drops seemed like they were pretty clearly from an insider and thus interesting, and worth paying attention to at least…
I started digging -
https:// motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/mg9vvn/how-our-likes-helped-trump-win
https:// samueljwoods.com/how-personality-tests-got-trump-elected/
My issue here is twofold -
1) This concept that Q-drops were designed and targeted to "conspiracy-theorists" may be used to discredit the whole storm (to some degree at least) if it cannot be effectively debunked/explained. (Unless the proof brought to light about the swamp creatures is completely damning and undeniable for all reasonable people, barring the estimated 4-6% Q said might not ever manage to cope/process/accept.)
2) The data from CA (or similar psychometric data types) may have genuinely been used to select/target 4/8ch as effective locations to seed Q's good info, so it may be partially true. In which case how can that strategy's use be addressed and acknowledged correctly, so that normies don't write off the whole operation as tailored propaganda.
Thoughts or further insight anons?
Q's Deep Dream references seem like they could be relevant here too.