Anonymous ID: eef0c6 Dec. 17, 2017, 5:12 p.m. No.115252   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5266

>>115248

>e website printed for his photo shoot, laying on his table?

 

This was an EXTREMELY hard to understand link.. Requiring pedo knowledge, russian, and weird porn references. These folks LOVE hiding in plain site. This would be a safe bet I would guess.

Anonymous ID: eef0c6 Dec. 17, 2017, 6:43 p.m. No.115697   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>115684

 

OK. Why would someone shill a well researched thread? No-one disagrees TANGENT = GANETT..

 

So, why are you angry about people disagreeing with the interpretation of the paper???

 

It has zero impact on Ganett research, which is 100% valid and a good thread, so why the fuck would this be a shill operation?