I don't think that we should follow this. It's a distraction to avert our focus from what's really happening now and here.
Yes. Let's stay focused on what really matters now and here. Dividing chan has already happened, next attempt is to divide focus, getting people chasing everything and achieving nothing. These are enemy tactics. Don't fall for this.
Don't bother with my posts then, dig. Make your own decisions. Like I do.
An airport with a power outage is shut down.
Q talked about "shutdown". We assumed it would relate to government.
If there was a fire at the airport, it should have been evacuated. But people were forced to stay there. This doesn't add up.
Agreed. Only gullible people are impressed by this sad example of shill tactics.
Yes.
Thank you for this highly intelligent and helpful(!) post. We should always ponder, if disruptive posts that divide attention and the forum itself are actually providing new insights or providing some 'meat'. This poster isn't posting any thoughts, nothing.
Right.
Very sensible approach, imo.
NYT article:
Douthat ended the article: “So very provisionally, credit belongs where it’s due — to our soldiers and diplomats, yes, but to our president as well.”
This is certainly new that the NYT writes something like this.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/18/ny-times-columnist-praises-trump-for-winning-against-isis-hits-media-for-not-giving-credit.html
Yes. Let's watch them and see, if they'll write more stuff like this. It could be a marker of changing winds.
Some anon posted that Q said on 12/07 ten days darkness, which could also mean darkness in ten days from then. Yesterday was the 17th and there was darkness in Atlanta…
So, you say it isn't relevant when a drill happened, just before a similar great event?
Is this the first time that a drill happened before a false flag?
Okay.
Punctuation matters.
What I wanted to ask was this: Had the drill been initiated by the bad guys?