So I was out most of the day, tried to read last 3 threads but didn't' see any mention of this in particular
How many people have been banned from twatter today, since it's the day that their new ToS comes into effect.?
So I was out most of the day, tried to read last 3 threads but didn't' see any mention of this in particular
How many people have been banned from twatter today, since it's the day that their new ToS comes into effect.?
Newfags, oldfags just coming over out of curiousity, pic related is for you. There are resources you can use to bring yourself up to speed (no pun intended) in the OP. One of these is the spreadsheet. Use it. It's there for you. No really, read it.
DO NOT ASK QUESTIONS UNTIL YOU DO.
https://app.smartsheet.com/b/publish?EQBCT=7e06675d22854a069d313fb6e08b2444
>Should we go back over all the Q posts with Speed now that the ATL/Amtrak stuff has happened?
YES - we should do this every day. Q specifically asked us to do this.
>Maybe these happenings can shine a new light on those crumbs?
PRECISELY. There is now a NEW COLUMN on the Spreadsheet so anons can enter news items that are relevant, to include:
>title
>date
>original link
>archive link
if not immediately obvious a short quote or statement why it's relevant
<future proves past
<news unlocks the map
Thank you! did you also post them here (together)?
Definitely worth investigating
Thank you, that is appreciated.
Also because both friends & foes monitor this board, and he can ask questions without violating NDA & NS. The Socratic method being used by Q is proven to be very effective. Pay no attention to the ones attempting to undermine any/all confidence, they come in waves.
Interesting - you should definitely post all your findings into the Gannett thread here:
Actually it's better to post your actual findings in the dedicated topic thread and then post links in here to them. This way, when the general thread falls off the catalog, the posts with the actual topic info will remain in the dedicated topic thread. Does that make sense?
washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/17/nancy-pelosis-super-pac-keeps-donations-from-backp/
https://archive.fo/LfJ4L
Oh yeah, it's big.
IIRC there is a board-wide rule that you can't post the exact same image more than once. Other anons can correct me if this is wrong, but I think you have to also change something in the image itself (even just one pixel) and then it is considered different by the system so you can post it. The reason is because otherwise we will be spammed by some grisly images no normal man (or woman) would ever want to see and it would destroy the board (ty BO for that). So any inconvenience we may experience is balanced by saving us from truly awful things.
The meme guy has posted some links to posts detailing different methods of "red-pilling" people, all very effective.
Apologize, sometimes things get glossed over, so I missed that. Frankly, that isn't getting the attention that it should IMO. While it's not a Q question specifically, c'mon, anon
DEMOCRATS getting CONTRIBUTIONS from a SEX TRAFFICKING WEBSITE?
horry sheeit
>All it does is paint a visual pic to connect the players, the tactics, and things to come
Yes. Our task is to
>answer the questions
>make the connections
>build the big picture
>break it back down to manageable, bite-sized chunks
>make memes to educate and calm the public
That is what we are here to do, that is our task.
Regardless whether anons are waiting for a HAPPENING or when/if HAPPENINGS happen, we will have our task. Are we doing it? Are we doing it effectively?
Let's get on the stick and get it done. How can you help?
Well, get to memeing then, fire up your own meme-cannon, impart what you know in any of the dedicated topic threads. Do something to help us, anon, otherwise why are you even here?
I'm really sorry, anon, I don't have those handy. He usually posts an update in the general every night when he /harvests/ the memes and makes zip files of them, he (I think) includes links to posts for the different methods of red-pilling.
So tl;dr night time generals, sorry I can't be more specific.
>did POTUS make that security statement today?
Yes, link in the News thread
You are welcome. I don't think they have been updated - the last Venn diagram was on 12/3, so some industrious anon might help out and update it (hopefully)
I keep pointing out that MI intel dude (on 4ch) said they (he and other intel guys observing the threads) were making circular flow diagrams/maps from the Q drops and THEY COULD SEE WHAT HE WAS SAYING CLEARLY. I looked up what that was (ignorance now cured) and have posted examples (was in the dough, not any more), even made a few myself in the meme thread.
Pic related are what they can look like. Q is asking us to show RELATIONSHIPS between people, places, businesses, foundations, organizations & activities (money laundering etc)
You can see some free tools to make the ones in pic related here >>>/cbts/111700 (in the OP)
>I think he means, could he have been banned since after Tripgate?
In the OP there is an explanation and a link to a post the 8ch Admin made showing that both Q's old (existing) and new tripcodes are whitelisted for this board.
We are all just anons now. Any tripfag who is still sore about losing trips is a waste of time to worry about all of that. We just pick up and keep kicking ass and taking names (and making memes). Soldier on, ignore all the rest of the noise.
Very well stated.
Yes, it's absolutely imperative. The memes with text+photo are good and can be incredibly effective, but if this is what MIL intel anon said they were doing and that this is what Q is trying to get us to produce, that's what we need to do. Also, since Q's last posting said we have everything, then we should start making the connections and showing them. The public understands that pols are corrupt but to see the links between foundations/donors/people/boards of directors/fat no-bid contracts etc is something else.
Can verify this is true to some degree, have been studying it for decades. Obviously being non-mil so no clearance I don't really know jack shit. But yes, all the literature, reading all sorts of weird scientific studies in obscure areas all point to this being available in some degree and form for at least 2 decades from what I can tell.
Military tech used to be ~30 years in advance of anything commercially available. But that was when our growth in tech was linear. It's now geometric so I dont' even know how to quantify the advancement mil vs. public commercially available.
Please don't think I was sniping about it - whoever is taking care of the pastebin and "dough" is kicking ass and we're all very grateful.