Should we go back over all the Q posts with Speed now that the ATL/Amtrak stuff has happened?

Maybe these happenings can shine a new light on those crumbs?

>>119312

I'd suspect not, good point. Still might be worthwhile given the insane amount of relevancy. No casualties on the crash, for whatever that's worth.

>>119325

His name means "Son of Cain." Very relevant in Masonic tradition/history/theology.

>>119331

Bible /x/tier stuff isn't less weird than aliens. But aliens don't fit into the cosmology as neatly.

My personal suspicion, as a Christian, is that if we were going to interact with aliens as a species, some hints would have been dropped in the Bible. I believe aliens exist, but not humanoids that evolved on other planets.

Rather, inter-dimensional entities such as demons, alt-genealogies like the Nephalim.

I do not think there are beings that will present themselves as aliens who are /ourguys/. My belief is that non-human entities who are in humanity's corner identify themselves by identifying the God they claim to be in service of.

I will forever be suspicious of any non-human entity that shows up to our planet, or is pushed by the mainstream, that does not affirm Christ.

NOT because it is more weird than anything in the Bible, but because it contradicts the Bible, which I have independently come to accept as infallible truth.

>>119347

Shit, my bad. Thanks. Last I heard there were hospitalizations and no deaths. Thanks for the correction.

>>119387

I believe in non-human entities. I don't believe that angels were simply biologically evolved lifeforms from other galaxies. I believe them to be created beings. I would use the words "spiritual," "inter-dimensional," "higher vibration," etc. interchangeably.

But I believe they are from another part of our reality. Not far away in this domain. That is the Biblical claim, and I have come to accept it.

>>119398

Agreed. Great points, especially in light of the 6 casualties.

>>119391

I'll check him out. I find myself agreeing most with Chuck Missler's line of thinking on the subject.

>>119410

Don't mean to derail, sorry. Just wanted to answer the question posed. If this is BO, I'll refrain from this discussion in main threads.

>>119419

Melchizidek implies to me that there are biological aspects to non-physical beings.

Angels were able to take human form, and often.

Happy to agree on the word "alien," my position is just a little off-center to the usual association of the word.

When I think of a spiritual/higher-dimensional being, I think of it in the style of a 3D object still possessing 2 dimensions, and then another. I would suspect an angel/demon has some bio/physical aspects to their being and then another or many other aspects to their being.

I'm going to tap out of this discussion, though, since I received a ban warning for forum sliding.

>>119667

Check the last thread (maybe the one before that?) and ctrl+F for "you have my attention." I saw it happen. Did seem to be Q as an anon.