>Several anons have contributed here with the suggestion that supporting ‘full disclosure’ is somehow naive. I believe that this position is understandable, but ultimately naivety itself. We are at a critical crossroads as a species. The evil that has grown in our midst, nearly to the point of our utter global annihilation, can be traced to many underlying causes – a major example being the damage to human development (emotional and intellectual) of severe childhood trauma; a factor that has been fully utilised by generations of cabal psychopaths reproducing their own kind.
>One overriding theme can be discerned as this spiritual/social cancer has metastasised amongst us; secrecy. All of this criminality has been facilitated by secrecy – by lack of transparency. This should not surprise anyone. Human beings are basically creatures of love, whose fundamental loving nature can be horribly obfuscated, inverted and smothered by severe trauma and/or mental illness. Some prefer to view this as a battle between good and evil. This is fine as far as it is practical, but ultimately I find it a crude dualism lacking nuance. The evil that has flourished in our midst would never have spread far beyond the sick (evil if you prefer) individuals originating these behaviours if our societies were open, transparent, and resistant to the threat of obfuscation-by-psychopathy that can infect us collectively. It is our very tendency to embrace ‘secrecy’ and ‘lack of transparency’ - specifically in the public realm, a tendency that has been encouraged and spread by the ‘high’ functioning psychopaths among us, that has left us so vulnerable to what has ultimately proven to be a global criminal network that has nearly destroyed us all.
>There are excellent reasons to be very careful with the mass public disclosure of these dark truths; after all, we do not raise our children overwhelming them with the negativity of the world before they are ready to absorb it in a balanced way. Too much, too soon – and we end up causing the kind of ‘psychological splitting’ through trauma that is ironically the black heart of psychopathic reproduction. But we absolutely have to commit to a full disclosure – we absolutely have to inoculate ourselves as a species from this ever happening again to us. This has happened to us precisely because lack of transparency in our societies has permitted this evil to arise and spread. Any so-called solution that does not embrace, and plan for, ultimate full global disclosure of everything – without exception – will doom us to repeat this sorry episode. The fear of the damage and chaos that full disclosure could cause is quite legitimate and well reasoned – but ultimately, we really do have no choice. To put it crudely – our problem is of the dark, the solution is of the light.
>I would finish with this point: we (the ‘redpilled’) have much to discuss and reflect regarding the tactics of disclosure; what to disclose when, who to disclose it to, how to best disclose. This process may well take generations. However, I believe that the bulk of the disclosure must be committed to within a generation – this is not a can to be kicked endlessly down the road, that is just inviting a new ‘well-intentioned’ culture of secrecy to develop, and the road to hell is paved with good intention like this. I actually think that is precisely how we got here in the first place.
thanks, I take no position on the rapidity of disclosure - I just do not have the data; specifically, I do not know the psychological 'bell-curve' of maturity we are dealing with here. Will 'most' people (at least, a critical number) hold their shit together and not riot and murder in the streets? I also do not know if a SHOCK effect as you describe is a real phenomena (with a positive outcome) or wishful thinking on your part. Get this wrong, potentially billions die. I want this discussed and explored far more than is being done, or even possible, here. Yes, the truth must come out. But are 'we' really not that fragile anon? You know this how?