>>120988 (cheKeKed)
they've turned the psyops up to 11
>they have few options here
this is, and has long been a lovely environment for brainstorming
>There is no record of an Act of Congress or Executive Order which either prescribes or prohibits the addition of fringe, nor is there any indication that any symbolism was ever associated with it. The use of fringe is optional with the person or organization displaying the flag.
there is a difference, it doesn't mean martial law as some claim, but there is significance.
did you ever wonder why the flag you pledge allegiance to has no fringe?
short story… it's mostly decoration
as I understand it Admiralty law is older law that is the basis for our constitutional law. not really circumvent, but supersede in some rare instances.
When the FED was formed what do you suppose Uncle Sam used as collateral? When you get a car loan the car is hypothecated, you get to use it, the bank owns it until paid off.
The domestic output of all U.S. citizens is hypothecated to service the debt to the FED. So in a sense we are owned chattel, or at least the tax revenue of us and our heirs unto perpetuity is so pledged by our loving Uncle Sam to pay off the vig