As anagrams have recently played an important part in the Q unveiling , I thought I’d take a look at the graffiti on the bridge of the Amtrak derailment. Apologies if this has already been done. I did check in the thread devoted to this subject though.

Am I correct in seeing

LABRATKNAT(S?) ?

This gives a multitude of imperfect anagrams ( ie none I can see with the 10/ 11 letters) but anagrams of this LABRATKNAT(S?) put together do create an interesting sentence:

Atlanta >BlatantArab >Al Akbar >Attak

Thoughts:

1. I might be starting a real conspiracy theory or unwittingly joining one already circulating and for that I’m truly sorry. So I’m ready to stand corrected.

1. The good guys shouldn’t need to wreck a train to get a truth bomb out. Was this unintentional though? ( last Q post)

2. A good guy tagged the bridge to get the message in a photo to release but the bad guys derailed a train in revenge.

3. ISIS did it ( but why in that case would they use “blatant” in their hidden mission report?) unless of course blatant was completely unintentional. It would sound more like an angry reaction than an admission of intent by ISIS.

4. Graffiti art is known as “Tagging” which led me to think about Q’s use of the word in relation to Tony Podesta’s effort to flee the country and his plane being forced to return by a Military Tag. He also added we would hear about this in the News but to my knowledge we haven’t.

5. Is Attack misspelt as ATTAK because the bombers were unsuccessful and countered?

6. I have found other words that could also be related but I’m giving it further thought before posting.